The purple line as a measure of labour progress: a longitudinal study
- PMID: 20846387
- PMCID: PMC2954951
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-54
The purple line as a measure of labour progress: a longitudinal study
Abstract
Background: Vaginal examination (VE) and assessment of the cervix is currently considered to be the gold standard for assessment of labour progress. It is however inherently imprecise with studies indicating an overall accuracy for determining the diameter of the cervix at between 48-56%. Furthermore, VEs can be unpleasant, intrusive and embarrassing for women, and are associated with the risk of introducing infection. In light of increasing concern world wide about the use of routine interventions in labour it may be time to consider alternative, less intrusive means of assessing progress in labour. The presence of a purple line during labour, seen to rise from the anal margin and extend between the buttocks as labour progresses has been reported. The study described in this paper aimed to assess in what percentage of women in labour a purple line was present, clear and measurable and to determine if any relationship existed between the length of the purple line and cervical dilatation and/or station of the fetal head.
Methods: This longitudinal study observed 144 women either in spontaneous labour (n = 112) or for induction of labour (n = 32) from admission through to final VE. Women were examined in the lateral position and midwives recorded the presence or absence of the line throughout labour immediately before each VE. Where present, the length of the line was measured using a disposable tape measure. Within subjects correlation, chi-squared test for independence, and independent samples t-test were used to analyse the data.
Results: The purple line was seen at some point in labour for 109 women (76%). There was a medium positive correlation between length of the purple line and cervical dilatation (r = +0.36, n = 66, P = 0.0001) and station of the fetal head (r = +0.42, n = 56, P < 0.0001).
Conclusions: The purple line does exist and there is a medium positive correlation between its length and both cervical dilatation and station of the fetal head. Where the line is present, it may provide a useful guide for clinicians of labour progress along side other measures. Further research is required to assess whether measurement of the line is acceptable to women in labour and also clinicians.
Similar articles
-
Relationship between length and width of the purple line and foetal head descent in active phase of labour.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Jan;38(1):10-15. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1322044. Epub 2017 Jun 22. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018. PMID: 28641025
-
The feasibility and accuracy of ultrasound assessment in the labor room.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Oct;32(20):3442-3451. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1465553. Epub 2018 Apr 30. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019. PMID: 29712501
-
Routine vaginal examinations for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women and babies at term.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 15;(7):CD010088. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010088.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23857468 Updated. Review.
-
Factors that affect ultrasound-determined labor progress in women undergoing induction of labor.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;220(6):592.e1-592.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.236. Epub 2019 Feb 5. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30735668
-
Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;221(4):335.e1-335.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.040. Epub 2019 May 30. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31153931
References
-
- Buchmann EJ, Libhaber E. Accuracy of cervical assessment in the active phase of labour. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2007;144:833–837. - PubMed
-
- Royal College of Midwives: Assessing Progress in Labour: Midwifery Practice Guideline. 2008. http://www.rcm.org.uk/college/standards-and-practice/practice-guidelines/
MeSH terms
Substances
Grant support
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
