Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Jan;26(1):64-9.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1501-z. Epub 2010 Sep 17.

Follow-up actions on electronic referral communication in a multispecialty outpatient setting

Hardeep Singh  1 , Adol Esquivel, Dean F Sittig, Daniel Murphy, Himabindu Kadiyala, Rachel Schiesser, Donna Espadas, Laura A Petersen
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Follow-up actions on electronic referral communication in a multispecialty outpatient setting

Hardeep Singh et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: Electronic health records (EHR) enable transmission and tracking of referrals between primary-care practitioners (PCPs) and subspecialists. We used an EHR to examine follow-up actions on electronic referral communication in a large multispecialty VA facility.

Methods: We retrieved outpatient referrals to five subspecialties between October 2006 and December 2007, and queried the EHR to determine their status: completed, discontinued (returned to PCP), or unresolved (no action taken by subspecialist). All unresolved referrals, and random samples of discontinued and completed referrals were reviewed to determine whether subspecialists took follow-up actions (i.e., schedule appointments anytime in the future) within 30 days of referral-receipt. For referrals without timely follow-up, we determined whether inaction was supported by any predetermined justifiable reasons or associated with certain referral characteristics. We also reviewed if PCPs took the required action on returned information.

Results: Of 61,931 referrals, 22,535 were discontinued (36.4%), and 474 were unresolved (0.8%). We selected 412 discontinued referrals randomly for review. Of these, 52% lacked follow-up actions within 30 days. Appropriate justifications for inaction were documented in 69.8% (150/215) of those without action and included lack of prerequisite testing by the PCP and subspecialist opinion that no intervention was required despite referral. We estimated that at 30 days, 6.3% of all referrals were associated with an unexplained lack of follow-up actions by subspecialists. Conversely, 7.4% of discontinued referrals returned to PCPs were associated with an unexplained lack of follow-up.

Conclusions: Although the EHR facilitates transmission of valuable information at the PCP-subspecialist interface, unexplained communication breakdowns in the referral process persist in a subset of cases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flowchart.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Forrest CB. A typology of specialists’ clinical roles. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1062–1068. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.114. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grimshaw JM, Winkens RA, Shirran L et al. Interventions to improve outpatient referrals from primary care to secondary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;CD005471. - PubMed
    1. Cummins RO, Smith RW, Inui TS. Communication failure in primary care. Failure of consultants to provide follow-up information. JAMA. 1980;243:1650–1652. doi: 10.1001/jama.243.16.1650. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Epstein RM. Communication between primary care physicians and consultants. Arch Fam Med. 1995;4:403–409. doi: 10.1001/archfami.4.5.403. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Graham PH. Improving communication with specialists. The case of an oncology clinic. Med J Aust. 1994;160:625–627. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources