Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Dec;45(6 Pt 1):1763-82.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01166.x. Epub 2010 Sep 17.

Chronic care improvement in primary care: evaluation of an integrated pay-for-performance and practice-based care coordination program among elderly patients with diabetes

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Chronic care improvement in primary care: evaluation of an integrated pay-for-performance and practice-based care coordination program among elderly patients with diabetes

Peter J Fagan et al. Health Serv Res. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effects of an intervention comprising (1) a practice-based care coordination program, (2) augmented by pay for performance (P4P) for meeting quality targets, and (3) complemented by a third-party disease management on quality of care and resource use for older adults with diabetes.

Data sources/study setting: Claims files of a managed care organization (MCO) for 20,943 adults aged 65 and older with diabetes receiving care in Alabama, Tennessee, or Texas, from January 2004 to March 2007.

Study design: A quasi-experimental, longitudinal study in which pre- and postdata from 1,587 patients in nine intervention primary care practices were evaluated against 19,356 patients in MCO comparison practices (>900). Five incentivized quality measures, two nonincentivized measures, and two resource-use measures were investigated. We examined trends and changes in trends from baseline to follow-up, contrasting intervention and comparison group member results.

Principal findings: Quality of care generally improved for both groups during the study period. Only slight differences were seen between the intervention and comparison group trends and changes in trends over time.

Conclusions: This study did not generate evidence supporting a beneficial effect of an on-site care coordination intervention augmented by P4P and complemented by third-party disease management on diabetes quality or resource use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Monthly Trend for Incentivized Quality Indicators: Low-Density Lipoprotein Screening, Influenza Vaccine, and Hemoglobin A1c Testing
Figure 2
Figure 2
Monthly Trend for Incentivized Quality Indicators: Nephropathy Screening and Eye Exam
Figure 3
Figure 3
Monthly Trend for Nonincentivized Quality Indicators: ACE Script for Those with Renal Insufficiency and No Short-Acting Medications
Figure 4
Figure 4
Monthly Trend for Emergency Department Visits and Per Member Per Month Costs

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2005. “National Healthcare Quality Report, 2005” [accessed August 19, 2010]. Available at http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/nhqr05/nhqr05.htm. - PubMed
    1. American Academy of Family Physicians. Joint Principles of the Patient-Centered Medical Home. Delaware Medical Journal. 2008;1:21–2. - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(S1):S13–61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antos J, Bertko J, Chernew M, Cutler D, Goldman D, McClellan M, McGlynn E, Pauly M, Schaeffer L, Shortell S. Bending the Curve: Effective Steps to Address Long-Term Health Care Spending Growth. Washington, DC: Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform; 2009. - PubMed
    1. Baker DW, Persell SD, Thompson JA, Soman NS, Burgner KM, Liss D, Kmetik KS. Automated Review of Electronic Health Records to Assess Quality of Care for Outpatients with Heart Failure. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2007;146(4):270–7. - PubMed

Publication types