The 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines are not supported by science: the scientific support for mammography screening
- PMID: 20868889
- DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2010.06.005
The 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines are not supported by science: the scientific support for mammography screening
Abstract
Mammography screening is one of the major medical accomplishments of the past 40 years. In light of the downstream consequences of any screening test, it was critical that mammography screening be challenged. There have been many legitimate challenges, as well as many challenges that are not scientifically based but have gained credibility because of repetition. The latter have led to a great deal of confusion among women and their physicians. The aim of this review is to dispel many of the misunderstandings that have developed in the past 4 decades and, hopefully, reduce the confusion that has occurred. Mammography screening does not find all breast cancers and does not find all cancers early enough to result in a cure, but it is a major advance, and women should not be denied access to its benefits.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb;196(2):W112-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5609. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011. PMID: 21257850
-
The recent US preventive services task force guidelines are not supported by the scientific evidence and should be rescinded.J Am Coll Radiol. 2010 Apr;7(4):260-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.12.008. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010. PMID: 20362940
-
Mammography in 40-year-old women: what difference does it make? The potential impact of the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) mammography guidelines.Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;18(11):3066-71. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2009-4. Epub 2011 Aug 24. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21863364
-
Breast cancer screening. Interpreting new data for clinical practice.Physician Assist. 1994 Oct;18(10):47-51, 56, 61-6. Physician Assist. 1994. PMID: 10138304 Review.
-
The use of breast imaging to screen women at high risk for cancer.Radiol Clin North Am. 2010 Sep;48(5):859-78. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2010.06.012. Radiol Clin North Am. 2010. PMID: 20868890 Review.
Cited by
-
Why Was the US Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 Breast Cancer Screening Recommendation So Objectionable? A Historical Analysis.Milbank Q. 2022 Sep;100(3):702-721. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12583. Epub 2022 Sep 23. Milbank Q. 2022. PMID: 36148791 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
No evidence of excessive cancer screening in female noncarriers from BRCA1/2 mutation-positive families.Curr Oncol. 2017 Dec;24(6):352-359. doi: 10.3747/co.24.3759. Epub 2017 Dec 20. Curr Oncol. 2017. PMID: 29270046 Free PMC article.
-
Breast cancer screening panels continue to confuse the facts and inject their own biases.Curr Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(5):e376-9. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2880. Curr Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26628879 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Population-based service mammography screening: the Icelandic experience.Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2013 May 9;5:17-25. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S44671. eCollection 2013. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2013. PMID: 24648754 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the screening practices of unaffected noncarriers under 40 and between 40 and 49 in BRCA1/2 families.J Genet Couns. 2013 Aug;22(4):469-81. doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9569-8. Epub 2013 Jan 25. J Genet Couns. 2013. PMID: 23345056
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
