Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Nov 9;182(16):1739-46.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.091729. Epub 2010 Oct 12.

Effect of antenatal peer support on breastfeeding initiation: a systematic review

Lucy Ingram  1 , Christine MacArthur, Khalid Khan, Jonathan J Deeks, Kate Jolly
Affiliations
Review

Effect of antenatal peer support on breastfeeding initiation: a systematic review

Lucy Ingram et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Background: Our objective was to examine the effect of antenatal peer support on rates of breastfeeding initiation.

Methods: We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized trials and cohort studies with concurrent controls. We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the National Research Register and the British Nursing Index from inception or from 1980 to 2009. We carried out study selection, data abstraction and quality assessment independently and in duplicate. We defined high-quality studies as those that minimized the risk of at least three of the following types of bias: selection, performance, measurement and attrition bias. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for individual studies and undertook separate meta-analyses for high-quality trials of universal peer support and targeted peer support. We did not include low-quality studies.

Results: We selected 11 studies, which involved 5445 women in total. Seven of these studies (involving 4416 women in total) evaluated universal peer support, and four studies (involving 1029 women in total) targeted antenatal peer support. In the three high-quality studies of universal peer support, all involving low-income women, the relative risk for not initiating breastfeeding was 0.96 (95% CI 0.76-1.22). In the three high-quality studies of antenatal peer support that targeted women considering breastfeeding, the relative risk for not initiating breastfeeding was 0.64 (95% CI 0.41-0.99).

Interpretation: Universal antenatal peer support does not appear to improve rates of breastfeeding initiation, but targeted antenatal peer support may be beneficial. This effect may be related to context, however, so any new peer-support program should undergo concurrent high-quality evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Identification of relevant literature on antenatal peer support to improve rates of breastfeeding initiation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of the effect of antenatal peer support on noninitiation of breastfeeding. Values less than 1.0 favour intervention. CI = confidence interval, RR = risk ratio.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Horta BL, Bahl R, Martines J, et al. Evidence on the long-term effects of breastfeeding: systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007. [(accessed 2010 May 12)]. Available: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2007/9789241595230_eng.pdf.
    1. Ip S, Chung M, Raman G, et al. Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007. [(accessed 2010 May 12)]. Evidence report no. 153. Available: www.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/evidence/pdf/brfout/brfout.pdf.
    1. Kramer MS, Kakuma R. The optimal duration of breastfeeding. A systematic review. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2004;554:63–77. - PubMed
    1. Bolling K, Grant C, Hamlyn B, et al. Infant feeding survey 2005. London (UK): The Information Centre; 2007. [(accessed 2010 May 12)]. Available: www.ic.nhs.uk/webfiles/publications/ifs06/2005%20Infant%20Feeding%20Surv....
    1. Kramer MS, Kakuma R. The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. [(accessed 2010 May 12)]. Available: www.who.int/nutrition/topics/optimal_duration_of_exc_bfeeding_review_eng....