Quality measurement and system change of cancer care delivery
- PMID: 20940654
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181d59529
Quality measurement and system change of cancer care delivery
Abstract
Cancer care quality measurement and system change may serve as a case example for larger possibilities in the health care system related to other diseases. Cancer care quality gaps and variation exist across both technical and patient-centered cancer quality measures, especially among vulnerable populations. There is a need to develop measures that address the following dimensions of quality and its context: disparities, overuse, patient-centeredness, and uncertainty. Developments that may promote system change in cancer care delivery include changes in the information market, organizational accountability, and consumer empowerment. Information market changes include public cancer care quality reporting, enabled by health information exchange, and incentivized by pay-for-performance. Moving organizational accountability, reimbursement, and quality measurement from individual episodes of care to multiple providers providing coordinated cancer care may address quality gaps associated with the fragmentation of care delivery. Consumer empowerment through new technologies, such as personal health records, may lead to the collection of patient-centered quality measures and promote patient self-management. Across all of these developments, leadership and ongoing research to guide informed system changes will be necessary to transform the cancer care delivery system.
Similar articles
-
Survivorship: adult cancer survivors.Prim Care. 2009 Dec;36(4):721-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2009.08.001. Prim Care. 2009. PMID: 19913184 Review.
-
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27. Pediatrics. 2004. PMID: 14702504
-
Keeping an eye on a moving target: quality changes and challenges for nurses.Nurs Econ. 2002 Nov-Dec;20(6):258-65, 290. Nurs Econ. 2002. PMID: 12567925 Review. No abstract available.
-
American Society of Clinical Oncology guidance statement: the cost of cancer care.J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 10;27(23):3868-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1183. Epub 2009 Jul 6. J Clin Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19581533
-
Creating a center for nursing excellence.JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul. 2004 Apr-Jun;6(2):44-51; quiz 52-3. JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul. 2004. PMID: 15387434 Review.
Cited by
-
Facilitating and Inhibiting Factors in the Design, Implementation, and Applicability of Value-Based Payment Models: A Systematic Literature Review.Med Care Res Rev. 2023 Oct;80(5):467-483. doi: 10.1177/10775587231160920. Epub 2023 Mar 23. Med Care Res Rev. 2023. PMID: 36951451 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Leveraging Implementation Science to Improve Cancer Care Delivery and Patient Outcomes.J Oncol Pract. 2017 Aug;13(8):523-529. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2017.024729. Epub 2017 Jul 10. J Oncol Pract. 2017. PMID: 28692331 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Oncologists' perspectives on post-cancer treatment communication and care coordination with primary care physicians.Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Jul;26(4):10.1111/ecc.12628. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12628. Epub 2017 Jan 10. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017. PMID: 28070939 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
