Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities
- PMID: 20962121
- PMCID: PMC3000760
- DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2010.005637
Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities
Abstract
Current research suggests that the rate of adoption of health information technology (HIT) is low, and that HIT may not have the touted beneficial effects on quality of care or costs. The twin issues of the failure of HIT adoption and of HIT efficacy stem primarily from a series of fallacies about HIT. We discuss 12 HIT fallacies and their implications for design and implementation. These fallacies must be understood and addressed for HIT to yield better results. Foundational cognitive and human factors engineering research and development are essential to better inform HIT development, deployment, and use.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Health information technology:Fallacies and Sober realities - Redux A homage to Bentzi Karsh and Robert Wears.Appl Ergon. 2020 Jan;82:102973. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102973. Epub 2019 Oct 30. Appl Ergon. 2020. PMID: 31677422
-
Factors that affect health information technology adoption by seniors: A systematic review.Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Nov;28(6):1827-1842. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13011. Epub 2020 May 7. Health Soc Care Community. 2020. PMID: 32378769
-
Health information technology and implementation science: partners in progress in the VHA.Med Care. 2013 Mar;51(3 Suppl 1):S6-12. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182884509. Med Care. 2013. PMID: 23407014
-
Adoption and use of health information technology in physician practice organisations: systematic review.Inform Prim Care. 2010;18(4):245-58. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v18i4.780. Inform Prim Care. 2010. PMID: 22040851 Review.
-
Human factors and health information technology: current challenges and future directions.Yearb Med Inform. 2014 Aug 15;9(1):58-66. doi: 10.15265/IY-2014-0005. Yearb Med Inform. 2014. PMID: 25123724 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
AHRQ's digital healthcare research program: 20 years of advancing innovation and discovery.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Nov 1;31(11):2766-2771. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae251. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024. PMID: 39348281 Free PMC article.
-
Retrospective analysis of the human-centered design process used to develop a clinical decision support in the emergency department: PE Dx Study Part 2.Hum Factors Health. 2023 Dec;4:Article 100055. doi: 10.1016/j.hfh.2023.100055. Epub 2023 Sep 30. Hum Factors Health. 2023. PMID: 38774123
-
Failures and fallacies of eHealth initiatives: Are we finally able to overcome the underlying theoretical and practical orthodoxies?Digit Health. 2024 May 15;10:20552076241254019. doi: 10.1177/20552076241254019. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2024. PMID: 38766362 Free PMC article.
-
Automation in health care: the need for an ergonomics-based approach.Ergonomics. 2023 Nov;66(11):1768-1781. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2023.2286915. Epub 2024 Jan 2. Ergonomics. 2023. PMID: 38165841 Review.
-
CancelRx case study: implications for clinic and community pharmacy work systems.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 6;23(1):1360. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10396-9. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 38057835 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA 1998;280:1311–16 - PubMed
-
- Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu SY, et al. Systematic review: Impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:742–52 - PubMed
-
- King WJ, Paice N, Rangrej J, et al. The effect of computerized physician order entry on medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. Pediatrics 2003;112:506–9 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
