Is revision surgery following lower-limb amputation a worthwhile procedure? A retrospective review of 71 cases

Abstract

There is little written about the value of revision surgery on lower-limb amputations. We report on 71 revision amputation procedures performed by a single surgeon in this retrospective analysis. The majority of our revisions (61%) were in amputees who had suffered trauma. We judged success from a surgical and a rehabilitation perspective using scoring systems. Revisions for bony and soft-tissue pathology had good outcomes from a surgical (85% and 82%) and a rehabilitation perspective. Revisions for infection had satisfactory results from a surgical perspective (73%) but less so from a rehabilitation perspective (25%). The results of the revisions for pain were poor showing surgical success only 50% of the time where a neuroma was suspected and only 25% when there was no apparent cause. There was little or no improvement in rehabilitation in both the pain groups. Revision surgery for certain pathologies gives a good surgical outcome and can improve pain and mobility status. Patient selection for surgery is key and evaluation by a multidisciplinary team is recommended.