Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;46(1 Pt 2):298-318.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01199.x. Epub 2010 Nov 5.

The effects of Medicaid and CHIP policy changes on receipt of preventive care among children

Affiliations

The effects of Medicaid and CHIP policy changes on receipt of preventive care among children

Genevieve M Kenney et al. Health Serv Res. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To examine changes in children's receipt of well-child and preventive dental care in Medicaid/Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) in two states that adopted policies aimed at promoting greater preventive care receipt.

Data sources: The 2004-2008 Medicaid/CHIP claims and enrollment data from Idaho and Kentucky.

Study design: Logistic and hazard pre-post regression models, controlling for age, gender, race/ethnicity, and eligibility category.

Data extraction methods: Claims and enrollment data were de-identified and merged.

Principal findings: Increased reimbursement had a small, positive association with well-child care in Idaho, but no consistent effects were found in Kentucky. A premium forgiveness program in Idaho was associated with a substantial increase (between 20 and 113 percent) in receipt of any well-child care and quicker receipt of well-child care following enrollment. In Kentucky, children saw modest increases in receipt of preventive dental care and received such care more quickly following increased dental reimbursement, while the move to managed care in Idaho was associated with a small increase in receipt of preventive dental care.

Conclusions: Policy changes such as reimbursement increases, incentives, and delivery system changes can lead to increases in preventive care use among children in Medicaid and CHIP, but reported preventive care receipt still falls short of recommended levels.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Academy of Pediatrics. 2009 Pediatric Medical Cost Model. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2009.
    1. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on Periodicity of Examination, Preventive Dental Services, Anticipatory Guidance/Counseling, and Oral Treatment for Infants, Children, and Adolescents. In 2009–10. Definitions, Oral Health Policies, and Clinical Guidelines. Reference Manual. 2009;31(6):118–25.
    1. Bergman D, Plsek P, Saunders M. “A High-Performing System for Well-Child Care: A Vision for the Future.” Commonwealth Fund Pub. 959. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 2006.
    1. Berman S, Dolins J, Tang S, Yudkowsky B. Factors That Influence the Willingness of Private Primary Care Pediatricians to Accept More Medicaid Patients. Pediatrics. 2002;110(2):239–48. - PubMed
    1. Blumberg SJ, O'Connor KS, Kenney GM. Unworried Parents of Well Children: A Look at Uninsured Children Who Reportedly Do Not Need Health Insurance. Pediatrics. 2005;116(2):345–51. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms