Accrual experience of National Cancer Institute Cooperative Group phase III trials activated from 2000 to 2007
- PMID: 21060029
- PMCID: PMC3020692
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.5382
Accrual experience of National Cancer Institute Cooperative Group phase III trials activated from 2000 to 2007
Abstract
Purpose: Recent reports have suggested that 40% or more of National Cancer Institute (NCI) -sponsored Cooperative Group phase III trials failed to achieve their accrual goals. We examine in detail the accrual experience of the Cooperative Group phase III trials.
Patients and methods: All Cooperative Group phase III trials activated from 2000 to 2007 were examined for their accrual experience. For trials that stopped accrual with < 90% of their accrual goal, the reasons for having < 90% accrual were documented. We focus on trials that ended with < 90% accrual because of inadequate accrual rates rather than for other reasons, such as an interim monitoring analysis by an independent data monitoring committee that stops the trial early because one treatment is clearly superior.
Results: There were 191 trials activated from 2000 to 2007. We project that 22.0% of these trials will have < 90% accrual because of inadequate accrual rates. We project that there will be 176,627 patients eventually accrued on the 191 trials (current accrual, 154,579) and that 2,991 of these patients will be on trials that have < 90% accrual because of inadequate accrual rates (1.7%). For nonpediatric cancer trials, the corresponding percentages are 26.7% and 2.0%.
Conclusion: We find that insufficient accrual rates are not as high as previously reported and that only a small proportion of patients were enrolled on trials that ended with insufficient accrual because of an inadequate accrual rate. NCI has implemented new procedures to reduce the number of trials that fail to reach their accrual goals and to minimize the number of patients accrued on these trials.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Challenges to accrual predictions to phase III cancer clinical trials: a survey of study chairs and lead statisticians of 248 NCI-sponsored trials.Clin Trials. 2011 Oct;8(5):591-600. doi: 10.1177/1740774511419683. Epub 2011 Aug 30. Clin Trials. 2011. PMID: 21878447 Free PMC article.
-
A sense of urgency: Evaluating the link between clinical trial development time and the accrual performance of cancer therapy evaluation program (NCI-CTEP) sponsored studies.Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Nov 15;16(22):5557-63. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0133. Epub 2010 Nov 9. Clin Cancer Res. 2010. PMID: 21062929 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting accrual achievement: monitoring accrual milestones of NCI-CTEP-sponsored clinical trials.Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Apr 1;17(7):1947-55. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1730. Epub 2011 Mar 29. Clin Cancer Res. 2011. PMID: 21447723 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges Facing Early Phase Trials Sponsored by the National Cancer Institute: An Analysis of Corrective Action Plans to Improve Accrual.Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 15;22(22):5408-5416. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0338. Epub 2016 Jul 11. Clin Cancer Res. 2016. PMID: 27401246 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The National Cancer Institute-American Society of Clinical Oncology Cancer Trial Accrual Symposium: summary and recommendations.J Oncol Pract. 2013 Nov;9(6):267-76. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001119. Epub 2013 Oct 15. J Oncol Pract. 2013. PMID: 24130252 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Statistical issues associated with terminating a clinical trial due to slow enrollment.J Nucl Cardiol. 2017 Apr;24(2):525-526. doi: 10.1007/s12350-016-0702-1. Epub 2016 Nov 1. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 27804066 No abstract available.
-
Automated determination of metastases in unstructured radiology reports for eligibility screening in oncology clinical trials.Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2013 Dec;238(12):1370-8. doi: 10.1177/1535370213508172. Epub 2013 Oct 9. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2013. PMID: 24108448 Free PMC article.
-
Trial-level factors affecting accrual and completion of oncology clinical trials: A systematic review.Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Oct 21;24:100843. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100843. eCollection 2021 Dec. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021. PMID: 34765799 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Barriers to Clinical Trial Enrollment in Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients With Cancer.Cancer Control. 2016 Oct;23(4):327-337. doi: 10.1177/107327481602300404. Cancer Control. 2016. PMID: 27842322 Free PMC article.
-
Using a Federated Network of Real-World Data to Optimize Clinical Trials Operations.JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018 Dec;2:1-10. doi: 10.1200/CCI.17.00067. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018. PMID: 30652541 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Zuckerman B, Corrigan J. The role of NCI-sponsored research in ASCO Clinical Cancer Advances 2005-2008. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(suppl):470s. abstr 6094.
-
- Korn EL, Dorey FJ. Applications of crude incidence curves. Stat Med. 1992;11:813–829. - PubMed
-
- Institute of Medicine. A National Cancer Clinical Trials System for the 21st Century: Reinvigorating the NCI Cooperative Group Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2010. p. 143. - PubMed
-
- Editorial: Faltering cancer trials. New York Times, April 24, 2010 (a version of this editorial appeared on p WK11 of the New York edition on April, 25, 2010) http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/25/opinion/25sun1.html.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
