Short- and long-term relationship orientation and 2D:4D finger-length ratio
- PMID: 21063903
- DOI: 10.1007/s10508-010-9698-9
Short- and long-term relationship orientation and 2D:4D finger-length ratio
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that preferences for close relationships (Long-Term Relationship Orientation) are independent of preferences for various sexual partners (Short-Term Relationship Orientation). In the current studies, we hypothesized that Short-Term Relationship Orientation would be negatively related to 2D:4D finger-length ratio (i.e., the more masculine, the higher Short-Term Relationship Orientation). Study 1 found a negative relationship between Short-Term Relationship Orientation and right, but not left, hand 2D:4D among 91 male participants. Study 2 found a negative relationship between Short-Term Relationship Orientation and left, but not right, hand 2D:4D among 65 male participants, even after controlling for age, relationship status, social desirability, and sex drive. Female participants (n = 142) did not show this relationship in Study 2. This sex difference was discussed in terms of flexible female sexual strategies, which are supposed to be contingent on the local environment or menstrual cycle variations.
Similar articles
-
Sexual orientation and the second to fourth finger length ratio: a meta-analysis in men and women.Behav Neurosci. 2010 Apr;124(2):278-87. doi: 10.1037/a0018764. Behav Neurosci. 2010. PMID: 20364887
-
2nd to 4th digit ratio (2D:4D) and number of sex partners: evidence for effects of prenatal testosterone in men.Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2006 Jan;31(1):30-7. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.05.009. Epub 2005 Jul 6. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2006. PMID: 16005157
-
The effects of sex, ethnicity, and sexual orientation on self-measured digit ratio (2D:4D).Arch Sex Behav. 2007 Apr;36(2):223-33. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9171-6. Arch Sex Behav. 2007. PMID: 17373585
-
Second to fourth digit ratio, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-chest ratio: their relationships in heterosexual men and women.Ann Hum Biol. 2003 Nov-Dec;30(6):728-38. doi: 10.1080/03014460310001620153. Ann Hum Biol. 2003. PMID: 14675912 Clinical Trial.
-
Photocopies yield lower digit ratios (2D:4D) than direct finger measurements.Arch Sex Behav. 2005 Jun;34(3):329-33. doi: 10.1007/s10508-005-3121-y. Arch Sex Behav. 2005. PMID: 15971015
Cited by
-
A meta-analysis of the association between male dimorphism and fitness outcomes in humans.Elife. 2022 Feb 18;11:e65031. doi: 10.7554/eLife.65031. Elife. 2022. PMID: 35179485 Free PMC article.
-
The Association Between Relationship Orientation, Relationship Quality and Sexual Satisfaction.Int J Appl Posit Psychol. 2022;7(3):439-459. doi: 10.1007/s41042-022-00076-0. Epub 2022 Sep 10. Int J Appl Posit Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36105744 Free PMC article.
-
Emotional stability is related to 2D:4D and social desirability in women: Possible implications on subjective well-being and psychopathology.PLoS One. 2021 Mar 9;16(3):e0248368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248368. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33690629 Free PMC article.
-
Intersexual and Intrasexual Differences in Mate Selection Preferences Among Lesbian Women, Gay Men, and Bisexual Women and Men.Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jan;53(1):177-203. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02665-9. Epub 2023 Aug 9. Arch Sex Behav. 2024. PMID: 37558933 Free PMC article.
-
Reproductive Success, Relationship Orientation, and Sexual Behavior in Heterosexuals: Relationship With Chronotype, Sleep, and Sex.Evol Psychol. 2019 Jul-Sep;17(3):1474704919859760. doi: 10.1177/1474704919859760. Evol Psychol. 2019. PMID: 31272215 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
