Iliac crest autogenous bone graft versus alloplastic graft and guided bone regeneration in the reconstruction of atrophic maxillae: a 5-year retrospective study on cost-effectiveness and clinical outcome
- PMID: 21087398
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00221.x
Iliac crest autogenous bone graft versus alloplastic graft and guided bone regeneration in the reconstruction of atrophic maxillae: a 5-year retrospective study on cost-effectiveness and clinical outcome
Abstract
Background: Reconstruction of the atrophic maxillae with autogenous bone graft and jawbone-anchored bridges is a well-proven technique. However, the morbidity associated with the concept should not be neglected. Furthermore, the costs for such treatment, including general anesthesia and hospital stay, are significant. Little data are found in the literature with regard to a cost-benefit approach to various treatment alternates.
Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare from a health-economical and clinical perspective the reconstruction of the atrophic maxillae prior to oral implant treatment either with autogenous bone grafts harvested from the iliac crest or the use of demineralized freeze-dried bone (DFDB) in combination with a thermoplastic carrier (Regeneration Technologies Inc., Alachua, FL, USA) and guided bone regeneration (GBR).
Materials and methods: A total of 26 patients (13 + 13) were selected and matched with regard to indication, sex, and age. The study was performed 5 years after the completion of the treatment. Implant survival, morbidity, and complications were analyzed. Furthermore, a detailed analysis of the total cost for the respective treatment modality was performed, including material, costs for staff, sick leave, etc.
Results: The study revealed no statistical difference with regard to implant survival for the respective groups. The average total cost, per patient, for the DFDB group was 22.5% of the total cost for a patient treated with autogenous bone grafting procedures.
Conclusions: The study concluded that reconstruction of atrophic maxillae with a bone substitute material (DFDB) in combination with GBR can be performed with an equal treatment outcome and with less resources and a significant reduced cost in selected cases compared with autogenous bone grafts from the iliac crest.
© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Guided bone regeneration with autogenous block grafts applied to Le Fort I osteotomy for treatment of severely resorbed maxillae: a 4- to 6-year prospective study.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Jan;23(1):60-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02181.x. Epub 2011 Apr 19. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012. PMID: 21504483
-
Clinical and histologic comparison of two different composite grafts for sinus augmentation: a pilot clinical trial.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Aug;19(8):755-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01536.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008. PMID: 18573123 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical and 3-Dimensional Radiographic Evaluation of Autogenous Iliac Block Bone Grafting and Guided Bone Regeneration in Patients With Atrophic Maxilla.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Apr;75(4):709-722. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.11.019. Epub 2016 Nov 26. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017. PMID: 27998736
-
Rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla using the combination of autogenous and allogeneic bone grafts followed by protocol-type prosthesis.J Craniofac Surg. 2010 Nov;21(6):1894-6. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181f4af65. J Craniofac Surg. 2010. PMID: 21119449 Review.
-
Bone graft harvesting from distant sites: concepts and techniques.Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2010 Aug;22(3):301-16, v. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2010.04.007. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2010. PMID: 20713264 Review.
Cited by
-
Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: A systematic literature review.Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jan-Jun;6(1):78-90. doi: 10.4103/2231-0746.186143. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2016. PMID: 27563613 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Vertical Guided Bone Regeneration using Titanium-reinforced d-PTFE Membrane and Prehydrated Corticocancellous Bone Graft.Open Dent J. 2014 Nov 14;8:194-200. doi: 10.2174/1874210601408010194. eCollection 2014. Open Dent J. 2014. PMID: 25419250 Free PMC article.
-
Discovery and characterization of heterogeneous and multipotent fibroblast populations isolated from excised cleft lip tissue.Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022 Sep 8;13(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-03154-x. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022. PMID: 36076255 Free PMC article.
-
Grafts for Ridge Preservation.J Funct Biomater. 2015 Aug 7;6(3):833-48. doi: 10.3390/jfb6030833. J Funct Biomater. 2015. PMID: 26262646 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Long-term effects of vertical bone augmentation: a systematic review.J Appl Oral Sci. 2016 Jan-Feb;24(1):3-17. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720150357. J Appl Oral Sci. 2016. PMID: 27008252 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
