The effect of surgeon volume on outcomes and resource use for vaginal hysterectomy
- PMID: 21099600
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fca8c5
The effect of surgeon volume on outcomes and resource use for vaginal hysterectomy
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the effect of surgical volume on outcomes and resource use in women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy.
Methods: Women who underwent total vaginal hysterectomy and were registered in the Perspective database were examined. Perspective is a nationwide database developed to measure quality and resource use. Procedure-associated intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative medical complications as well as hospital readmission, length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) use, operating time, and cost were analyzed. Based on the overall gynecologic surgical volume and vaginal surgical volume of their surgeons, patients were stratified into tertiles. Complications were compared using adjusted generalized estimating equations and reported as odds ratios (ORs).
Results: A total of 77,109 patients operated on by 6,195 gynecologic surgeons were identified. After adjustment for the effects of other demographic variables and concomitant procedures, patients operated on by high-volume vaginal surgeons were 31% (OR 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.80) less likely to experience an operative injury, whereas perioperative complications were reduced by 19% (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.72-0.92), medical complications decreased by 24% (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.67-0.86), ICU admission reduced by 46% (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.43-0.73), and the transfusion rate decreased by 28% (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.61-0.85) in patients treated by high-volume vaginal surgeons, whereas rates of readmission were higher (OR 1.24; 95% CI 1.04-1.47) in patients treated by high-volume surgeons. Operative times were lower in patients operated on by high-volume surgeons (P<.001). Although total gynecologic surgical volume had no effect on cost, patients treated by high-volume vaginal surgeons had lower costs (P<.001).
Conclusion: Perioperative morbidity and resource use are lower in women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy when the procedure is performed by high-volume vaginal surgeons.
Similar articles
-
Effect of surgical volume on morbidity and mortality of abdominal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May;117(5):1051-1059. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821647a0. Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 21508742
-
The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):490.e1-490.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 14. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 30222939
-
Influence of surgical volume on outcome for laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar;19(3):948-58. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2090-8. Epub 2011 Oct 12. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012. PMID: 21989660
-
Surgical outcomes for low-volume vs high-volume surgeons in gynecology surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;215(1):21-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.048. Epub 2016 Mar 3. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26945605 Review.
-
Surgical Trend and Volume Effect on the Choice of Hysterectomy Benign Gynecologic Conditions.Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2021 Jan 30;10(1):1-9. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_68_20. eCollection 2021 Jan-Mar. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2021. PMID: 33747766 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Urinary tract injury during hysterectomy: Does surgeon specialty and surgical volume matter?World J Methodol. 2023 Mar 20;13(2):18-25. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v13.i2.18. eCollection 2023 Mar 20. World J Methodol. 2023. PMID: 37035027 Free PMC article.
-
Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Revolution: The Next Frontier in Gynecologic Minimally Invasive Surgery.JSLS. 2023 Jan-Mar;27(1):e2022.00082. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00082. JSLS. 2023. PMID: 36818766 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications-surgical volume matters: a retrospective cohort study comparing complications of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomies.J Robot Surg. 2022 Oct;16(5):1199-1207. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01340-2. Epub 2022 Jan 3. J Robot Surg. 2022. PMID: 34981444
-
The value of volume.J Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Jan;33(1):e17. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e17. Epub 2021 Nov 22. J Gynecol Oncol. 2022. PMID: 34910398 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Effect of Minimum-Volume Standards on Patient Outcomes and Surgical Practice Patterns for Hysterectomy.Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;132(5):1229-1237. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002912. Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 30303921 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Merrill RM. Hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 1997 through 2005. Med Sci Monit 2008;14:CR24–31.
-
- Jacoby VL, Autry A, Jacobson G, Domush R, Nakagawa S, Jacoby A. Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1041–8.
-
- Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:1091–5.
-
- Makinen J, Johansson J, Tomás C, Tomás E, Heinonen PK, Laatikainen T, et al. Morbidity of 10 110 hysterectomies by type of approach. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1473–8.
-
- McPherson K, Metcalfe MA, Herbert A, Maresh M, Casbard A, Hargreaves J, et al. Severe complications of hysterectomy: the VALUE study. BJOG 2004;111:688–94.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
