Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan;49(1):37-45.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f37d28.

Family and friend participation in primary care visits of patients with diabetes or heart failure: patient and physician determinants and experiences

Affiliations

Family and friend participation in primary care visits of patients with diabetes or heart failure: patient and physician determinants and experiences

Ann-Marie Rosland et al. Med Care. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Professional and patient groups have called for increased participation of patients' informal support networks in chronic disease care, as a means to improve clinical care and self-management. Little is known about the current level of participation of family and friends in the physician visits of adults with chronic illnesses or how that participation affects the experience of patients and physicians.

Methods: Written survey of 439 functionally independent adults with diabetes or heart failure and 88 of their primary care physicians (PCPs). Patients were ineligible if they had a memory disorder, needed help with activities of daily living, or were undergoing cancer treatment.

Results: Nonprofessional friends or family ("companions") regularly participated in PCP visits for nearly half (48%) of patients. In multivariable models, patients with low health literacy (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.9, confidence interval [CI]: 1.4-5.7), more depressive symptoms (AOR: 1.3, CI: 1.1-1.6), and 4 or more comorbid illnesses (AOR: 3.7, CI: 1.3-10.5) were more likely to report companion participation. Patients reported that they were more likely to understand PCP advice (77%) and discuss difficult topics with the physician (44%) when companions participated in clinic visits. In multivariable models, companion participation was associated with greater patient satisfaction with their PCP (AOR: 1.7, CI: 1.1-2.7). Most PCPs perceived visit companions positively, however 66% perceived 1 or more barriers to increasing companion participation, including increased physician burden (39%), inadequate physician training (27%), and patient privacy concerns (24%).

Conclusion: Patients' companions represent an important source of potential support for the clinical care of functionally independent patients with diabetes or heart failure, particularly for patients vulnerable to worse outcomes. Companion participation in care was associated with positive patient and physician experiences. Physician concerns about companion participation are potentially addressable through existing training resources.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Companion Experiences With Family Participation In PCP Care
“When your friends or family talk to your [primary care] doctor, how often have you had the following experiences?” (N=193*)
Figure 2
Figure 2. a: Physician Experiences when Companions Participate in Patient’s PCP Care
“When your diabetes or heart failure patients’ friends or family talk to you about your patient’s care, how often have you had the following experiences?” b: Physician Barriers to More Companion Participation “How do you feel about talking with family and friends of diabetes or heart failure patients more often?”

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases . National Diabetes Statistics, 2007 Fact Sheet Bethesda, MD. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health; 2008.
    1. Hobbs FDR. Clinical burden and health service challenges of chronic heart failure. Oxford University Press; 2009. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heisler M, Bouknight RR, Hayward RA, Smith DM, Kerr EA. The relative importance of physician communication, participatory decision making, and patient understanding in diabetes self-management. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2002 Apr;17(4):243–252. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heisler M, Cole I, Weir D, Kerr EA, Hayward RA. Does physician communication influence older patients’ diabetes self-management and glycemic control? Results from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Dec;62(12):1435–1442. - PubMed
    1. Rost K, Roter D. Predictors of recall of medication regimens and recommendations for lifestyle change in elderly patients. Gerontologist. 1987 Aug;27(4):510–515. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms