Surveillance of screening-detected cancers (colon and rectum, breast, and cervix) - United States, 2004-2006
- PMID: 21102407
Surveillance of screening-detected cancers (colon and rectum, breast, and cervix) - United States, 2004-2006
Abstract
Problem/condition: Population-based screening is conducted to detect diseases or other conditions in persons before symptoms appear; effective screening leads to early detection and treatment, thereby reducing disease-associated morbidity and mortality. Based on systematic reviews of the evidence of the benefits and harms and assessments of the net benefit of screening, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends population-based screening for colon and rectum cancer, female breast cancer, and uterine cervix cancer. Few publications have used national data to examine the stage at diagnosis of these screening-amenable cancers.
Reporting period covered: 2004-2006.
Description of systems: Data were obtained from cancer registries affiliated with CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Combined data from the NPCR and SEER programs provide the best source of information on national population-based cancer incidence. Data on cancer screening were obtained from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. This report provides stage-specific cancer incidence rates and screening prevalence by demographic characteristics and U.S. state.
Results: Approximately half of colorectal and cervical cancer cases and one third of breast cancer cases were diagnosed at a late stage of disease. Incidence rates of late-stage cancer differed by age, race/ethnicity, and state. Incidence rates of late-stage colorectal cancer increased with age and were highest among black men and women. Incidence rates of late-stage breast cancer were highest among women aged 60-79 years and black women. Incidence rates of late-stage cervical cancer were highest among women aged 50-79 years and Hispanic women. The percentage of persons who received recommended screening differed by age, race/ethnicity, and state.
Interpretation: Differences in late-stage cancer incidence rates might be explained partially by differences in screening use.
Public health action: The findings in this report emphasize the need for ongoing population-based surveillance and reporting to monitor late-stage cancer incidence trends. Screening can identify colorectal, cervical, and breast cancers in earlier and more treatable stages of disease. Multiple factors, including individual characteristics and health behaviors as well as provider and clinical systems factors, might account for why certain populations are underscreened. Cancer control planners, including comprehensive cancer-control programs, can use late-stage cancer incidence and screening prevalence data to identify populations that would benefit from interventions to increase screening utilization and to monitor performance of early detection programs.
Similar articles
-
Surveillance for Cancers Associated with Tobacco Use - United States, 2010-2014.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018 Nov 2;67(12):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6712a1. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018. PMID: 30383737 Free PMC article.
-
Surveillance for cancers associated with tobacco use--United States, 1999-2004.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2008 Sep 5;57(8):1-33. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2008. PMID: 18772853
-
Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study.Cancer Causes Control. 2009 May;20(4):417-35. doi: 10.1007/s10552-008-9256-0. Epub 2008 Nov 12. Cancer Causes Control. 2009. PMID: 19002764 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for Skin Cancer in Adults: An Updated Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jul. Report No.: 14-05210-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jul. Report No.: 14-05210-EF-1. PMID: 27583318 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2000, featuring the uses of surveillance data for cancer prevention and control.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Sep 3;95(17):1276-99. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djg040. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003. PMID: 12953083 Review.
Cited by
-
Colorectal cancer screening participation in First Nations populations worldwide: a systematic review and data synthesis.EClinicalMedicine. 2024 May 25;73:102666. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102666. eCollection 2024 Jul. EClinicalMedicine. 2024. PMID: 38828132 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating Stacked Methylation Markers for Blood-Based Multicancer Detection.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 1;15(19):4826. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194826. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37835520 Free PMC article.
-
The Spatial-Temporal Dimension of Oncological Prevalence and Mortality in Romania.Geohealth. 2023 Oct 4;7(10):e2023GH000901. doi: 10.1029/2023GH000901. eCollection 2023 Oct. Geohealth. 2023. PMID: 37799773 Free PMC article.
-
Integration of Cancer Screening Data into Routine Cancer Surveillance Systems: A Florida Pilot Project.J Registry Manag. 2022 Winter;49(4):132-138. J Registry Manag. 2022. PMID: 37260814 Free PMC article.
-
Recent Trends in Biosensing and Diagnostic Methods for Novel Cancer Biomarkers.Biosensors (Basel). 2023 Mar 18;13(3):398. doi: 10.3390/bios13030398. Biosensors (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36979610 Free PMC article. Review.
