Effects of the Paula method in electromyographic activation of the pelvic floor: a comparative study

Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Jun;22(6):677-80. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1331-x. Epub 2010 Nov 23.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: To determine if Paula method of circular muscles contraction e.g., those surrounding the eyes, mouth and fingers, could increase pelvic floor muscle (PFM) activity.

Methods: Thirty-four healthy, nulliparous volunteers were included, with an average age of 28 (± 5.9) years and body mass index of 23.8 (± 3.3) kg/m(2). They were assigned to randomly perform the sequence: a PFM maximal voluntary contraction, a contraction of circular muscles, followed by a simultaneous combination of PFM and circular muscle contraction. The PFM were evaluated using surface electromyography.

Results: PFM activity at baseline was 22.6 (± 10.9) μv. It was unchanged with Paula method contraction (p=0.322). There were also no differences between values of PFM maximal voluntary contraction alone, 99.8 (± 44.3) μv and in combination with the Paula method, 91.8 (± 35.3) μv (p=0.093).

Conclusions: The Paula method seems not to increase PFM activity in nulliparous women.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Electromyography
  • Exercise / physiology*
  • Exercise Therapy / methods*
  • Eyelids / physiology
  • Facial Muscles / physiology*
  • Female
  • Fingers / physiology
  • Humans
  • Mouth / physiology
  • Muscle Contraction / physiology*
  • Pelvic Floor / physiology*
  • Random Allocation
  • Young Adult