Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr;46(2):555-71.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01205.x. Epub 2010 Nov 24.

Changes in patient sorting to nursing homes under public reporting: improved patient matching or provider gaming?

Affiliations

Changes in patient sorting to nursing homes under public reporting: improved patient matching or provider gaming?

Rachel M Werner et al. Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To test whether public reporting in the setting of postacute care in nursing homes results in changes in patient sorting.

Data sources/study setting: All postacute care admissions from 2001 to 2003 in the nursing home Minimum Data Set.

Study design: We test changes in patient sorting (or the changes in the illness severity of patients going to high- versus low-scoring facilities) when public reporting was initiated in nursing homes in 2002. We test for changes in sorting with respect to pain, delirium, and walking and then examine the potential roles of cream skimming and downcoding in changes in patient sorting. We use a difference-in-differences framework, taking advantage of the variation in the launch of public reporting in pilot and nonpilot states, to control for underlying trends in patient sorting.

Principal findings: There was a significant change in patient sorting with respect to pain after public reporting was initiated, with high-risk patients being more likely to go to high-scoring facilities and low-risk patients more likely to go to low-scoring facilities. There was also an overall decrease in patient risk of pain with the launch of public reporting, which may be consistent with changes in documentation of pain levels (or downcoding). There was no significant change in sorting for delirium or walking.

Conclusions: Public reporting of nursing home quality improves matching of high-risk patients to high-quality facilities. However, efforts should be made to reduce the incentives for downcoding by nursing facilities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correlation between Patient Risk on Admission and Facility Report Card Score (Or Patient Sorting) before and after Report Card Scores Were Publicly Reported Notes. Results are stratified by location in a pilot versus nonpilot state because public reporting was launched at different times in pilot and nonpilot states. The vertical lines show the timing of the launch of public reporting in pilot states (in black) and nonpilot states (in gray). Results from multivariate regression described in Equation 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arling G, Lewis T, Kane RL, Mueller C, Flood S. Improving Quality Assessment through Multilevel Modeling: The Case of Nursing Home Compare. Health Service Research. 2007;42(3, Part 1):1177–99. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berwick DM, James B, Coye MJ. Connections between Quality Measurement and Improvement. Medical Care. 2003;41(1) suppl:I-30–8. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid. 2008. “Nursing Home Compare” [accessed on September 19, 2008]. Available at http://www.medicare.gov/Nhcompare/Home.asp.
    1. Dranove D, Kessler D, McClellan M, Satterthwaite M. Is More Information Better? The Effects of “Report Cards” on Health Care Providers. Journal of Political Economy. 2003;111(3):555–88.
    1. Fung CH, Lim Y-W, Mattke S, Damberg C, Shekelle PG. Systematic Review: The Evidence That Publishing Patient Care Performance Data Improves Quality of Care. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2008;148(2):111–23. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms