Comparison of bone mineral density changes around short, metaphyseal-fitting, and conventional cementless anatomical femoral components

J Arthroplasty. 2011 Sep;26(6):931-940.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.10.001. Epub 2010 Dec 4.

Abstract

We investigated the incidence and degree of stress shielding and clinical and radiographic results in 2 groups of patients. Fifty patients (60 hips) in each group were enrolled for a randomized study. One group received a short, metaphyseal-fitting femoral component and another group received a conventional metaphyseal- and diaphyseal-filling femoral component. The mean follow-up was 3.35 years in both groups. Bone mineral density was significantly increased in femoral zone 1 but slightly decreased in zone 7 in the short, metaphyseal-fitting stem group. In the conventional metaphyseal- and diaphyseal-fitting stem group, bone mineral density was markedly decreased in both zones 1 and 7. Clinical and radiographic results were similar between the 2 groups. No hip in either group required revision of the component.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Absorptiometry, Photon
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / instrumentation*
  • Bone Density / physiology*
  • Female
  • Femur / diagnostic imaging
  • Femur / physiology*
  • Femur / surgery
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hip Joint / diagnostic imaging
  • Hip Joint / surgery
  • Hip Prosthesis*
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Osteoarthritis, Hip / surgery*
  • Osteonecrosis / surgery*
  • Pain / epidemiology
  • Prosthesis Design*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stress, Physiological