Reduction in physician reimbursement and use of hormone therapy in prostate cancer

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Dec 15;102(24):1826-34. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq417. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

Abstract

Background: Use of androgen suppression therapy (AST) in prostate cancer increased more than threefold from 1991 to 1999. The 2003 Medicare Modernization Act reduced reimbursements for AST by 64% between 2004 and 2005, but the effect of this large reduction on use of AST is unknown.

Methods: A cohort of 72,818 men diagnosed with prostate cancer in 1992-2005 was identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. From Medicare claims data, indicated AST was defined as 3 months or more of AST in the first year in men with metastatic disease (n = 8030). Non-indicated AST was defined as AST given without other therapies such as radical prostatectomy or radiation in men with low-risk disease (n = 64,788). The unadjusted annual proportion of men receiving AST was plotted against the median Medicare AST reimbursement. A multivariable model was used to estimate the odds of AST use in men with low-risk and metastatic disease, with the predictor of interest being the calendar year of the payment change. Covariates in the model included age in 5-year categories, clinical tumor stage (T1-T4), World Health Organization grade (1-3, unknown), Charlson comorbidity (0, 1, 2, ≥ 3), race, education, income, and tumor registry site, all as categorical variables. The models included variations in the definition of AST use (≥ 1, ≥ 3, and ≥ 6 months of AST). All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: AST use in the low-risk group peaked at 10.2% in 2003, then declined to 7.1% in 2004 and 6.1% in 2005. After adjusting for tumor and demographic covariates, the odds of receiving non-indicated primary AST decreased statistically significantly in 2004 (odds ratio [OR] = 0.70, 95% confidence interval = 0.61 to 0.80) and 2005 (OR = 0.61, 95% confidence interval = 0.53 to 0.71) compared with 2003. AST use in the metastatic disease group was stable at 60% during the payment change, and the adjusted odds ratio of receiving AST in this group was unchanged in 2004-2005.

Conclusions: In this example of hormone therapy for prostate cancer, decreased physician reimbursement was associated with a reduction in overtreatment without a reduction in needed services.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Androgen Antagonists / economics*
  • Androgen Antagonists / therapeutic use*
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal / economics*
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal / therapeutic use*
  • Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
  • Cohort Studies
  • Drug Prescriptions / economics
  • Drug Prescriptions / statistics & numerical data*
  • Health Resources / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Medicare* / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent / drug therapy*
  • Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent / economics
  • Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent / pathology
  • Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent / radiotherapy
  • Odds Ratio
  • Palliative Care / methods
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / economics
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / pathology
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / radiotherapy
  • Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
  • SEER Program
  • United States

Substances

  • Androgen Antagonists
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal