The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for detection of major depressive disorder in primary care: consequences of current thresholds in a crosssectional study
- PMID: 21144018
- PMCID: PMC3009622
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-98
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for detection of major depressive disorder in primary care: consequences of current thresholds in a crosssectional study
Abstract
Background: There is a need for brief instruments to ascertain the diagnosis of major depressive disorder. In this study, we present the reliability, construct validity and accuracy of the PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 to detect major depressive disorder in primary care.
Methods: Cross-sectional analyses within a large prospective cohort study (PREDICT-NL). Data was collected in seven large general practices in the centre of the Netherlands. 1338 subjects were recruited in the general practice waiting room, irrespective of their presenting complaint. The diagnostic accuracy (the area under the ROC curve and sensitivities and specificities for various thresholds) was calculated against a diagnosis of major depressive disorder determined with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI).
Results: The PHQ-9 showed a high degree of internal consistency (ICC = 0.88) and test-retest reliability (correlation = 0.94). With respect to construct validity, it showed a clear association with functional status measurements, sick days and number of consultations. The discriminative ability was good for the PHQ-9 (area under the ROC curve = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.84-0.90) and the PHQ-2 (ROC area = 0.83, 95% CI 0.80-0.87). Sensitivities at the recommended thresholds were 0.49 for the PHQ-9 at a score of 10 and 0.28 for a categorical algorithm. Adjustment of the threshold and the algorithm improved sensitivities to 0.82 and 0.84 respectively but the specificity decreased from 0.95 to 0.82 (threshold) and from 0.98 to 0.81 (algorithm). Similar results were found for the PHQ-2: the recommended threshold of 3 had a sensitivity of 0.42 and lowering the threshold resulted in an improved sensitivity of 0.81.
Conclusion: The PHQ-9 and the PHQ-2 are useful instruments to detect major depressive disorder in primary care, provided a high score is followed by an additional diagnostic work-up. However, often recommended thresholds for the PHQ-9 and the PHQ-2 resulted in many undetected major depressive disorders.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Utility and limitations of PHQ-9 in a clinic specializing in psychiatric care.BMC Psychiatry. 2012 Jul 3;12:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-73. BMC Psychiatry. 2012. PMID: 22759625 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability and validity of the Thai version of the PHQ-9.BMC Psychiatry. 2008 Jun 20;8:46. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-8-46. BMC Psychiatry. 2008. PMID: 18570645 Free PMC article.
-
The Validity and Reliability of the PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 on Screening for Major Depression in Spanish Speaking Immigrants in Chile: A Cross-Sectional Study.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 27;19(21):13975. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113975. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36360856 Free PMC article.
-
A diagnostic meta-analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) algorithm scoring method as a screen for depression.Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015 Jan-Feb;37(1):67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Sep 23. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015. PMID: 25439733 Review.
-
Which instruments to support diagnosis of depression have sufficient accuracy? A systematic review.Nord J Psychiatry. 2015;69(7):497-508. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2015.1008568. Epub 2015 Mar 3. Nord J Psychiatry. 2015. PMID: 25736983 Review.
Cited by
-
A cross-sectional observational study comparing individuals with a symptomatic full-thickness rotator cuff tear with age-matched controls.JSES Int. 2023 Nov 21;8(1):58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.10.006. eCollection 2024 Jan. JSES Int. 2023. PMID: 38312262 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating self- vs interviewer-administered screening for depression in sickle cell disease.Blood Adv. 2024 Feb 13;8(3):699-702. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023012083. Blood Adv. 2024. PMID: 38113469 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
"Without it, I am not sure I would still be here": a mixed methods service evaluation for online EMDR trauma therapy in a primary care network in England.Front Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 28;14:1301540. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1301540. eCollection 2023. Front Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 38090696 Free PMC article.
-
Sensitivity and specificity of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9, PHQ-8, PHQ-2) and General Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7, GAD-2) for depression and anxiety diagnosis: a cross-sectional study in a Peruvian hospital population.BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 15;13(9):e076193. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076193. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37714674 Free PMC article.
-
Outcome assessment of a complex mental health intervention in the workplace. Results from the MENTUPP pilot study.Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2023 Oct;96(8):1149-1165. doi: 10.1007/s00420-023-01996-3. Epub 2023 Jul 14. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2023. PMID: 37452149 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Gibbon M, First MB. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). I: History, rationale, and description. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49:624–629. - PubMed
-
- Williams JB, Gibbon M, First MB, Spitzer RL, Davies M, Borus J. et al.The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). II. Multisite test-retest reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49:630–636. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
