Managing low back pain in the primary care setting: the know-do gap
- PMID: 21165374
- PMCID: PMC3008665
- DOI: 10.1155/2010/252695
Managing low back pain in the primary care setting: the know-do gap
Abstract
Objective: To ascertain knowledge gaps in the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic low back pain (LBP) in the primary care setting to prepare a scoping survey for identifying knowledge gaps in LBP management among Alberta's primary care practitioners, and to identify potential barriers to implementing a multidisciplinary LBP guideline.
Methods: English language studies, published from 1996 to 2008, comparing the clinical practice patterns of primary care practitioners with guideline recommendations were identified by systematically searching literature databases, the websites of various health technology assessment agencies and libraries, and the Internet. Data were synthesized qualitatively.
Results: The literature search identified 14 relevant studies. Knowledge gaps were reported among various primary care practitioner groups in the assessment of red flags, use of diagnostic imaging, provision of advice regarding sick leave and continuing activity, administration of some medications (muscle relaxants, oral steroids and opioids) and recommendation of particular treatments (acupuncture, physiotherapy, spinal manipulation, traction, ultrasound, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and spinal mobilization).
Conclusions: A know-do gap clearly exists among primary care practitioners with respect to the diagnosis and treatment of LBP. The information on know-do gaps will be used to construct a survey tool for unearthing the local knowledge gaps extant among Alberta's primary care practitioners, and to develop a dissemination strategy for a locally produced multidisciplinary LBP guideline, with the aim of ensuring that the know-do gaps inherent within each primary practice discipline are specifically targeted.
OBJECTIF :: Déterminer l’écart entre savoir et faire dans le diagnostic et le traitement des douleurs lombaires (DL) aiguës et chroniques en soins de première ligne afin de préparer un sondage de délimitation de l’étendue dans la prise en charge des DL chez les praticiens de première ligne de l’Alberta et déterminer les obstacles potentiels à l’implantation de lignes directrices multidisciplinaires sur les DL.
MÉTHODOLOGIE :: Les chercheurs ont repéré des études en anglais, publiées entre 1996 et 2008, comparant les modes de pratique clinique des praticiens de première ligne aux recommandations de lignes directrices en faisant des recherches systématiques dans les bases de données de publication, les sites Web de divers organismes d’évaluation technologique et de bibliothèques et Internet. Ils ont synthétisé les données de manière qualitative.
RÉSULTATS :: L’analyse bibliographique a permis de repérer 14 études pertinentes. Les divers groupes de praticiens de soins de première ligne ont déclaré des écarts des savoirs dans l’évaluation des signes annonciateurs, le recours à l’imagerie diagnostique, la prestation de conseils au sujet des congés de maladie et la poursuite des activités, l’administration de certains médicaments (relaxants musculaires, stéroïdes par voie orale et opiacés) et les recommandations de traitements précis (acupuncture, physiothérapie, manipulation vertébrale, traction, échographie, stimulation nerveuse électrique transcutanée et mobilisation vertébrale).
CONCLUSIONS :: Il existe clairement un écart entre savoir et faire chez les praticiens de première ligne pour ce qui est du diagnostic et du traitement des DL. L’information sur l’écart entre savoir et faire permettra aux chercheurs de préparer un sondage afin de mettre à jour les écarts des savoirs locaux chez les praticiens de première ligne de l’Alberta et d’élaborer des stratégies de diffusion des lignes directrices multidisciplinaires sur les DL produites localement afin de s’assurer que les écarts entre savoir et faire inhérents à chaque discipline des soins de première ligne soient spécifiquement ciblés.
Similar articles
-
The effectiveness of a posted information package on the beliefs and behavior of musculoskeletal practitioners: the UK Chiropractors, Osteopaths, and Musculoskeletal Physiotherapists Low Back Pain ManagemENT (COMPLeMENT) randomized trial.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 15;35(8):858-66. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d4e04b. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010. PMID: 20308941 Clinical Trial.
-
Are They Complying? Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Readiness to Change Regarding Low Back Pain Treatment Guideline Adherence.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Feb 15;42(4):247-252. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001714. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017. PMID: 28207666
-
Initial Management of Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: Responses from Brief Interviews of Primary Care Providers.J Altern Complement Med. 2021 Mar;27(S1):S106-S114. doi: 10.1089/acm.2020.0391. J Altern Complement Med. 2021. PMID: 33788610 Free PMC article.
-
Synthesis of recommendations for the assessment and management of low back pain from recent clinical practice guidelines.Spine J. 2010 Jun;10(6):514-29. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.03.032. Spine J. 2010. PMID: 20494814 Review.
-
The Alberta Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Ambassador Program: The Development of a Contextually Relevant, Multidisciplinary Clinical Practice Guideline for Non-specific Low Back Pain: A Review.Physiother Can. 2011 Summer;63(3):278-86. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2009-39P. Epub 2011 Aug 10. Physiother Can. 2011. PMID: 22654233 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Status and Vitamin D Supplements Use Are Not Associated with Low Back Pain in the Large UK Biobank Cohort.Nutrients. 2024 Mar 12;16(6):806. doi: 10.3390/nu16060806. Nutrients. 2024. PMID: 38542718 Free PMC article.
-
Chronic low back pain and its impact on physical function, mental health, and health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional study in Singapore.Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 21;12(1):20040. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24703-7. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36414674 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of Initial Health Care Provider on Subsequent Health Care Utilization for Patients With a New Onset of Low Back Pain: A Scoping Review.Phys Ther. 2022 Dec 6;102(12):pzac150. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzac150. Phys Ther. 2022. PMID: 36317766 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evidence-Based Practice for Non-Specific Low Back Pain: Canadian Physiotherapists' Adherence, Beliefs, and Perspectives.Physiother Can. 2022 Jan 1;74(1):44-53. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2020-0038. Epub 2021 Jun 11. Physiother Can. 2022. PMID: 35185247 Free PMC article.
-
Musculoskeletal Imaging for Low Back Pain in Direct Access Physical Therapy Compared to Primary Care: An Observational Study.Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Feb 2;17(2):237-246. doi: 10.26603/001c.31720. eCollection 2022. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2022. PMID: 35136693 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Van Tulder M, Koes B, Bombardier C. Low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2002;16:761–75. - PubMed
-
- Margarido MS, Kowalski SC, Natour J, Ferraz MB. Acute low back pain: Diagnostic and therapeutic practices reported by Brazilian rheumatologists. Spine. 2005;30:567–71. - PubMed
-
- Devereaux MW. Low back pain. Prim Care. 2004;31:33–51. - PubMed
-
- Nyiendo J, Haas M, Goldberg B, Sexton G. Pain, disability, and satisfaction outcomes and predictors of outcomes: A practice-based study of chronic low back pain patients attending primary care and chiropractic physicians. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001;24:433–9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
