Development and pilot testing of the collaborative practice assessment tool
- PMID: 21182434
- DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2010.532620
Development and pilot testing of the collaborative practice assessment tool
Abstract
Collaborative practice is receiving increased attention as a model of healthcare delivery that positively influences the effectiveness and efficiency of patient care while improving the work environment of healthcare providers. The collaborative practice assessment tool (CPAT) was developed from the literature to enable interprofessional teams to assess their collaborative practice. The CPAT survey included 56 items across nine domains including: mission and goals; relationships; leadership; role responsibilities and autonomy; communication; decision-making and conflict management; community linkages and coordination; perceived effectiveness and patient involvement; in addition to three open-ended questions. The tool was developed for use in a variety of settings involving a diversity of healthcare providers with the aim of helping teams to identify professional development needs and corresponding educational interventions. The results of two pilot tests indicated that the CPAT is a valid and reliable tool for assessing levels of collaborative practice within teams. This article describes the development of the tool, the pilot testing and validation process, as well as limitations of the tool.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS): development and testing of the instrument.J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2012 Winter;32(1):58-67. doi: 10.1002/chp.21123. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2012. PMID: 22447712
-
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953. Pediatrics. 2005. PMID: 15629972
-
Developing collaborative person-centred practice: a pilot project on a palliative care unit.J Interprof Care. 2007 Feb;21(1):69-81. doi: 10.1080/13561820600906593. J Interprof Care. 2007. PMID: 17365375
-
Reducing the failure risk of interdisciplinary healthcare teams.Crit Care Nurs Q. 2009 Apr-Jun;32(2):81-8. doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0b013e3181a27af2. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2009. PMID: 19300070 Review.
-
Collaborative practice teams: from multidisciplinary to interdisciplinary.Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract. 1998 Jul-Sep;2(3):95-8. Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract. 1998. PMID: 9775914 Review.
Cited by
-
Reliability and validity of the Taiwanese version of the collaborative practice assessment tool: A pilot study.Tzu Chi Med J. 2023 Apr 13;35(3):267-276. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_200_22. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep. Tzu Chi Med J. 2023. PMID: 37545791 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a community-based integrated care model (CIE) for frail older people in rural Foshan, China: study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial {1}.Trials. 2023 May 8;24(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07328-7. Trials. 2023. PMID: 37158975 Free PMC article.
-
Are we ready to collaborate? The interprofessional collaborative competencies of healthcare professionals in the Global South context.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 21;9:904658. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.904658. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36341234 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring Intra and Interorganizational Integration Efforts Involving the Primary Care Sector - A Case Study from Ontario.Int J Integr Care. 2022 Sep 8;22(3):15. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5541. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep. Int J Integr Care. 2022. PMID: 36131888 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation, mechanisms of change and contextual factors of a complex intervention to improve interprofessional collaboration and the quality of medical care for nursing home residents: study protocol of the process evaluation of the interprof ACT intervention package.Trials. 2022 Jul 8;23(1):561. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06476-6. Trials. 2022. PMID: 35804455 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
