The past, present, and future of comparative effectiveness research in the US Department of Veterans Affairs
- PMID: 21184864
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.002
The past, present, and future of comparative effectiveness research in the US Department of Veterans Affairs
Abstract
A particular challenge for the healthcare provider and the patient is to choose among competing therapeutic approaches for a particular condition. Often, the relative benefits and risks of potential therapies are not uniformly available from the existing scientific information. Many have pointed to the need for more comparative effectiveness research (CER) to aide in these decisions. The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has a long history of conducting CER. The success of the VA CER program has been facilitated by several important aspects of scientific infrastructure related to (1) research question refinement, (2) study design, planning and coordination, (3) evidence synthesis, and (4) implementation research. In publications that had VA coauthors in 2 major medical journals, 25% of the published studies were classified as CER. The most frequent categories of study were pharmaceutical and behavioral interventions. In the future, the CER enterprise will move toward increased input from clinicians in research topic choice and enhanced consideration of other methodologies besides the randomized controlled trial.
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Similar articles
-
Scientific and organizational collaboration in comparative effectiveness research: the VA cooperative studies program model.Am J Med. 2010 Dec;123(12 Suppl 1):e24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.005. Am J Med. 2010. PMID: 21184863
-
Methodological issues in comparative effectiveness research: clinical trials.Am J Med. 2010 Dec;123(12 Suppl 1):e8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.003. Am J Med. 2010. PMID: 21184867 Review.
-
Implementation research: a critical component of realizing the benefits of comparative effectiveness research.Am J Med. 2010 Dec;123(12 Suppl 1):e38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.007. Am J Med. 2010. PMID: 21184866
-
Observational methods in comparative effectiveness research.Am J Med. 2010 Dec;123(12 Suppl 1):e16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.004. Am J Med. 2010. PMID: 21184862 Review.
-
Comparative effectiveness research: what kind of studies do we need?J Investig Med. 2010 Aug;58(6):764-9. doi: 10.231/JIM.0b013e3181e3d2af. J Investig Med. 2010. PMID: 20479661 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative effectiveness research and its utility in In-clinic practice.Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Jan-Mar;7(1):9-14. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.173780. Perspect Clin Res. 2016. PMID: 26955571 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Using Health Care Utilization and Publication Patterns to Characterize the Research Portfolio and to Plan Future Research Investments.PLoS One. 2014 Dec 10;9(12):e114873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114873. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25493576 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
