Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia: development and validation of the fullPIERS model
- PMID: 21185591
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61351-7
Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia: development and validation of the fullPIERS model
Abstract
Background: Pre-eclampsia is a leading cause of maternal deaths. These deaths mainly result from eclampsia, uncontrolled hypertension, or systemic inflammation. We developed and validated the fullPIERS model with the aim of identifying the risk of fatal or life-threatening complications in women with pre-eclampsia within 48 h of hospital admission for the disorder.
Methods: We developed and internally validated the fullPIERS model in a prospective, multicentre study in women who were admitted to tertiary obstetric centres with pre-eclampsia or who developed pre-eclampsia after admission. The outcome of interest was maternal mortality or other serious complications of pre-eclampsia. Routinely reported and informative variables were included in a stepwise backward elimination regression model to predict the adverse maternal outcome. We assessed performance using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC). Standard bootstrapping techniques were used to assess potential overfitting.
Findings: 261 of 2023 women with pre-eclampsia had adverse outcomes at any time after hospital admission (106 [5%] within 48 h of admission). Predictors of adverse maternal outcome included gestational age, chest pain or dyspnoea, oxygen saturation, platelet count, and creatinine and aspartate transaminase concentrations. The fullPIERS model predicted adverse maternal outcomes within 48 h of study eligibility (AUC ROC 0·88, 95% CI 0·84-0·92). There was no significant overfitting. fullPIERS performed well (AUC ROC >0·7) up to 7 days after eligibility.
Interpretation: The fullPIERS model identifies women at increased risk of adverse outcomes up to 7 days before complications arise and can thereby modify direct patient care (eg, timing of delivery, place of care), improve the design of clinical trials, and inform biomedical investigations related to pre-eclampsia.
Funding: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development, and Research Training in Human Reproduction; Preeclampsia Foundation; International Federation of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research; and Child and Family Research Institute.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
The PIERS trial: hope for averting deaths from pre-eclampsia.Lancet. 2011 Jan 15;377(9761):185-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61463-8. Epub 2010 Dec 23. Lancet. 2011. PMID: 21185592 No abstract available.
-
Prediction of pre-eclampsia complications.Lancet. 2011 Apr 16;377(9774):1313; author reply 1314. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60531-X. Lancet. 2011. PMID: 21497690 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Predicting complications in pre-eclampsia: external validation of the fullPIERS model using the PETRA trial dataset.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Aug;179:58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 Jun 2. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014. PMID: 24965981
-
Placental growth factor for the prognosis of women with preeclampsia (fullPIERS model extension): context matters.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Nov 5;20(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03332-w. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020. PMID: 33153436 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of the fullPIERS model in predicting adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia using patient data from the PIERS (Pre-eclampsia Integrated Estimate of RiSk) cohort, collected on admission.BJOG. 2013 Jan;120(1):113-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03496.x. Epub 2012 Oct 19. BJOG. 2013. PMID: 23078362
-
Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes from pre-eclampsia and other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A systematic review.Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018 Jan;11:115-123. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 21. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018. PMID: 29198742 Review.
-
The performance of risk prediction models for pre-eclampsia using routinely collected maternal characteristics and comparison with models that include specialised tests and with clinical guideline decision rules: a systematic review.BJOG. 2016 Aug;123(9):1441-52. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14029. Epub 2016 May 26. BJOG. 2016. PMID: 27225348 Review.
Cited by
-
Prediction of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with pre-eclampsia and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Sep 27;76:102861. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102861. eCollection 2024 Oct. EClinicalMedicine. 2024. PMID: 39391014 Free PMC article.
-
How can we reduce maternal mortality due to preeclampsia? The 4P rule.Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024 May 27;46:e-rbgo43. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo43. eCollection 2024. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 39381341 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical Profile of Patients Presenting With Eclampsia at a Semi-urban Tertiary Care Center.Cureus. 2024 Jul 29;16(7):e65651. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65651. eCollection 2024 Jul. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39205718 Free PMC article.
-
ENhancinG vAGinal dElivery in Greece through educational and behavioral interventions among maternity care providers regarding labor management: the ENGAGE stepped-wedge randomized prospective trial protocol.Trials. 2024 Aug 19;25(1):548. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08263-x. Trials. 2024. PMID: 39155367 Free PMC article.
-
sFlt1/PlGF among patients with suspected preeclampsia when considering hypertensive status.AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 May 27;4(3):100359. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100359. eCollection 2024 Aug. AJOG Glob Rep. 2024. PMID: 39005612 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources

