Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr;64(4):401-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015. Epub 2011 Jan 5.

GRADE Guidelines: 3. Rating the Quality of Evidence

Affiliations

GRADE Guidelines: 3. Rating the Quality of Evidence

Howard Balshem et al. J Clin Epidemiol. .

Abstract

This article introduces the approach of GRADE to rating quality of evidence. GRADE specifies four categories-high, moderate, low, and very low-that are applied to a body of evidence, not to individual studies. In the context of a systematic review, quality reflects our confidence that the estimates of the effect are correct. In the context of recommendations, quality reflects our confidence that the effect estimates are adequate to support a particular recommendation. Randomized trials begin as high-quality evidence, observational studies as low quality. "Quality" as used in GRADE means more than risk of bias and so may also be compromised by imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness of study results, and publication bias. In addition, several factors can increase our confidence in an estimate of effect. GRADE provides a systematic approach for considering and reporting each of these factors. GRADE separates the process of assessing quality of evidence from the process of making recommendations. Judgments about the strength of a recommendation depend on more than just the quality of evidence.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 1,081 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback