Patient satisfaction with family physician colonoscopists
- PMID: 21209344
- DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.01.100112
Patient satisfaction with family physician colonoscopists
Abstract
Purpose: assessing patient satisfaction after endoscopy with a standardized survey is recommended by gastrointestinal professional societies. The purpose of this study was to assess both patient satisfaction with colonoscopy performed by family physicians and physicians' technical competence in colonoscopy.
Methods: modified Group Health Association of America 9 surveys were sent to all 230 patients who received a colonoscopy by family physicians at Madigan Army Medical Center from June to December 2007. Responses were graded on a 5-point Likert scale (LS), with a score of ≥ 3 (good to excellent) defined as a favorable response. Procedure reports and medical records were reviewed for all patients, and selected quality indicators were compared with recommended colonoscopy standards.
Results: sixty-nine percent of patients responded: 85 men (54%; mean age ± SD, 54.9 ± 5.6 years) and 73 women (46%; mean age ± SD, 54.3 ± 4.3 years). The overall rating of the visit received a favorable response rate of 98% (average LS rating, 4.6). Nearly all patients said they would have the procedure repeated by the same physician (98%) and at the same facility (98%). The overall reach-the-cecum rate was 100%. Adenomas were detected in 22% of women and 36% of men. All polyps measuring <2 cm were removed, and 99% of the procedures had scope withdrawal times of at least 6 minutes. Hemostasis techniques were used for 2 patients after polypectomy. There were no perforations.
Conclusion: family physicians can perform colonoscopy with a high level of accuracy, safety, and patient satisfaction.
Similar articles
-
Outpatient colonoscopy by rural family physicians.Ann Fam Med. 2005 Mar-Apr;3(2):122-5. doi: 10.1370/afm.268. Ann Fam Med. 2005. PMID: 15798037 Free PMC article.
-
An evaluation of patient attitudes to colonoscopy and the importance of endoscopist interaction and the endoscopy environment to satisfaction and value.Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar;48(3):366-73. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2012.758768. Epub 2013 Jan 16. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 23320489
-
Colonoscopy performed by a family physician. A case series of 751 procedures.J Fam Pract. 1997 May;44(5):473-80. J Fam Pract. 1997. PMID: 9152265
-
Colonoscopy in rural communities: can family physicians perform the procedure with safe and efficacious results?J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004 Sep-Oct;17(5):353-8. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.17.5.353. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004. PMID: 15355949 Review.
-
Importance of determining indication for colonoscopy: implications for practice and policy original.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Dec;12(12):1958-63.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.09.028. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014. PMID: 25606584 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Long-term patient satisfaction of gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures.Ann Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr-Jun;29(2):188-95. doi: 10.20524/aog.2016.0011. Ann Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 27065732 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of double pants with single pants on satisfaction with colonoscopy.World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul 14;19(26):4177-84. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i26.4177. World J Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 23864781 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical