Applicability of zirconia dental prostheses for metal allergy patients

Int J Prosthodont. 2010 Nov-Dec;23(6):562-5.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the applicability of zirconium dioxide (zirconia) as a substitute for metal alloys in a group of metal allergy patients. Fourteen patients (eight women, six men) who had been restored with porcelain-fused-to-metal fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and had exhibited hypersensitivity lesions to dental alloys were enrolled in this study. Patients were previously patch-tested using standard testing substances authorized by the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Patients received FPDs with zirconia frameworks and occurrences of oral symptoms were evaluated. No hypersensitivity lesions in the mouth or on the skin were encountered during the follow-up period of 3 years. Zirconia FPDs may be an alternative to porcelain-fused-to-metal FPDs in patients with metal allergies.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aluminum Silicates / chemistry
  • Cobalt / adverse effects
  • Computer-Aided Design
  • Copper / adverse effects
  • Crowns
  • Dental Alloys / adverse effects*
  • Dental Materials / chemistry*
  • Dental Prosthesis Design
  • Denture Design*
  • Denture, Partial, Fixed*
  • Dermatitis, Allergic Contact / etiology
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Gingivitis / chemically induced
  • Humans
  • Hypersensitivity / etiology*
  • Male
  • Metal Ceramic Alloys / adverse effects
  • Middle Aged
  • Nickel / adverse effects
  • Palladium / adverse effects
  • Patch Tests
  • Potassium Compounds / chemistry
  • Stomatitis / chemically induced
  • Young Adult
  • Zirconium / chemistry*

Substances

  • Aluminum Silicates
  • Dental Alloys
  • Dental Materials
  • Metal Ceramic Alloys
  • Potassium Compounds
  • feldspar
  • Cobalt
  • Palladium
  • Copper
  • Nickel
  • Zirconium
  • zirconium oxide