Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan 18;154(2):94-102.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-2-201101180-00008.

The association between hospital volume and processes, outcomes, and costs of care for congestive heart failure

Karen E Joynt  1 , E John Orav, Ashish K Jha
Affiliations

The association between hospital volume and processes, outcomes, and costs of care for congestive heart failure

Karen E Joynt et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: Congestive heart failure (CHF) is common and costly, and outcomes remain suboptimal despite pharmacologic and technical advances.

Objective: To examine whether hospitals with more experience in caring for patients with CHF provide better, more efficient care.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: 4095 hospitals in the United States.

Patients: Medicare fee-for-service patients with a primary discharge diagnosis of CHF.

Measurements: Hospital Quality Alliance CHF process measures; 30-day, risk-adjusted mortality rates; 30-day, risk-adjusted readmission rates; and costs per discharge. National Medicare claims data from 2006 to 2007 were used to examine the relationship between hospital case volume and quality, outcomes, and costs for patients with CHF.

Results: Hospitals in the low-volume group had lower performance on the process measures (80.2%) than did medium-volume (87.0%) or high-volume (89.1%) hospitals (P < 0.001). In the low-volume group, being admitted to a hospital with a higher case volume was associated with lower mortality, lower readmission, and higher costs. Similar, though smaller, relationships were found between case volume and both mortality and costs in the medium- and high-volume hospital groups.

Limitations: Analysis was limited to Medicare patients 65 years or older. Risk adjustment was performed by using administrative data.

Conclusion: Experience with managing CHF, as measured by an institution's volume, is associated with higher quality of care and better outcomes for patients but a higher cost. Understanding which practices employed by high-volume institutions account for these advantages can help improve quality of care and clinical outcomes for all patients with CHF.

Primary funding source: American Heart Association.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures:

Dr. Jha has provided consulting support to UpToDate. Dr. Orav has no conflics to declare. Dr. Joynt has no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between CHF volume and processes, outcomes, and costs of care
Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between CHF volume and processes, outcomes, and costs of care
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2008;117(4):e25–e146. - PubMed
    1. MedPAC. (Medicare Payment Advisory Commission). A data book: healthcare spending and the Medicare program. 2009
    1. Krumholz HM. Patterns of Hospital Performance in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure 30-Day Mortality and Readmission. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 - PubMed
    1. Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson EV, Birkmeyer CM. Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative. Surgery. 2001;130(3):415–422. - PubMed
    1. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1128–1137. - PubMed

Publication types