Description of the development and validation of the Canadian Paediatric Trigger Tool
- PMID: 21242527
- PMCID: PMC3088437
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.041152
Description of the development and validation of the Canadian Paediatric Trigger Tool
Abstract
Objective: To describe the process of developing and validating the Canadian Association of Paediatric Health Centres Trigger Tool (CPTT).
Methods: Five existing trigger tools were consolidated with duplicate triggers eliminated. After a risk analysis and modified Delphi process, the tool was reduced from 94 to 47 triggers. Feasibility of use was tested, reviewing 40 charts in three hospitals. For validation, charts were randomly selected across four age groups, half medical/half surgical diagnoses, from six paediatric academic health sciences centres. 591 charts were reviewed by six nurses (for triggers and adverse events (AEs)) and three physicians (for AEs only). The incidence of trigger- and AE-positive charts was documented, and the sensitivity and specificity of the tool to identify charts with AEs were determined. Identification of AEs by nurses and physicians was compared. The positive predictive value (PPV) of each trigger was calculated and the ratio of false- to true-positive AE predictors analysed for each trigger.
Results: Nurses rated the CPTT easy to use and identified triggers in 61.1% (361/591; 95% CI 57.2 to 65.0) of patient charts; physicians identified AEs in 15.1% (89/ 591, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.43). Over a third of patients with AEs were neonates. The sensitivity and specificity were 0.88 and 0.44, respectively. Nurse and physician AE assessments correlated poorly. The PPV for each trigger ranged from 0 to 88.3%. Triggers with a false/true-positive ratio of >0.7 were eliminated, resulting in the final 35-trigger CPTT.
Conclusions: The CPTT is the first validated, comprehensive trigger tool available to detect AEs in children hospitalised in acute care facilities.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Validation of triggers and development of a pediatric trigger tool to identify adverse events.BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 21;14:655. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0655-5. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014. PMID: 25527905 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Adverse events among children in Canadian hospitals: the Canadian Paediatric Adverse Events Study.CMAJ. 2012 Sep 18;184(13):E709-18. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.112153. Epub 2012 Jul 30. CMAJ. 2012. PMID: 22847964 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of traditional trigger tool to data warehouse based screening for identifying hospital adverse events.BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Feb;22(2):130-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001102. Epub 2012 Oct 4. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013. PMID: 23038408
-
Development of a trigger tool to identify adverse events and no-harm incidents that affect patients admitted to home healthcare.BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jul;27(7):502-511. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006755. Epub 2017 Sep 29. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018. PMID: 28971884 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring harm and informing quality improvement in the Welsh NHS: the longitudinal Welsh national adverse events study.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2017 Feb. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2017 Feb. PMID: 28252896 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Global Assessment of Pediatric Patient Safety Tool for identifying safety incidents in pediatric patients.Rev Paul Pediatr. 2023 May 15;41:e2022076. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2023/41/2022076. eCollection 2023. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2023. PMID: 37194838 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence and characteristics of adverse events in paediatric inpatient care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Mar;32(3):133-149. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015298. Epub 2022 Dec 26. BMJ Qual Saf. 2023. PMID: 36572528 Free PMC article.
-
How safe are paediatric emergency departments? A national prospective cohort study.BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Oct 19;31(11):806-817. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014608. BMJ Qual Saf. 2022. PMID: 35853646 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence, severity, and preventability of adverse events during the induction of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a tertiary care pediatric hospital in Mexico.PLoS One. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0265450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265450. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35324939 Free PMC article.
-
Development of the Japanese version of the Intensive Care Unit Trigger Tool to detect adverse events in critically ill patients.Acute Med Surg. 2021 Jun 22;8(1):e672. doi: 10.1002/ams2.672. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec. Acute Med Surg. 2021. PMID: 34188941 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med 1991;324:370–6 - PubMed
-
- Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med 1991;324:377–84 - PubMed
-
- Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, et al. The Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust 1995;163:458–71 - PubMed
-
- Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin HR, et al. Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med Care 2000;38:261–71 - PubMed