Building a departmental quality program: a patient-based and provider-led approach
- PMID: 21248609
- DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318209346e
Building a departmental quality program: a patient-based and provider-led approach
Abstract
Quality improvement in health care today requires a comprehensive approach. Improvement efforts led by patients, payers, regulators, or health care providers face many barriers. Obstacles include selecting measures with clinical value, building physician acceptance, establishing routine and efficient measurement, and resolving competing clinical demands and work flow impediments. To meet these challenges, the Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of Medicine created a grassroots quality program guided by four main principles: improvement is led by frontline clinicians who select measures important to their patients, performance measurement is automated and accurate, appropriate resources are provided, and interventions are system based and without financial incentives for individual providers. The quality program has engaged the department's physicians from the start. Given the flexibility to define their own metrics according to their patients' needs, clinicians have selected measures related to prevention and wellness, which are often based on national standards. The central quality team facilitates measurement and reporting while providers focus on patient care. The subsequent production of meaningful, actionable data has been instrumental in building physician acceptance and in providing clinicians the opportunity to evaluate and monitor performance. The program's largest challenges have been in capturing meaningful data from electronic systems. The program's system-based focus encourages providers to develop solutions within the existing framework of clinic resources, primarily targeting work flows and processes, while minimizing large expenditures on additional staffing.
Similar articles
-
A Model for the Departmental Quality Management Infrastructure Within an Academic Health System.Acad Med. 2017 May;92(5):608-613. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001380. Acad Med. 2017. PMID: 27603038
-
The creation and impact of a dedicated section on quality and patient safety in a clinical academic department.Acad Med. 2013 Feb;88(2):173-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31827b53dd. Acad Med. 2013. PMID: 23269289
-
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447009
-
Making inpatient medication reconciliation patient centered, clinically relevant and implementable: a consensus statement on key principles and necessary first steps.J Hosp Med. 2010 Oct;5(8):477-85. doi: 10.1002/jhm.849. J Hosp Med. 2010. PMID: 20945473
-
An academic health center sees both challenges and enabling forces as it creates an accountable care organization.Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Nov;31(11):2388-94. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0155. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012. PMID: 23129668 Review.
Cited by
-
Improving Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccination Rates in Ambulatory Specialty Practices.Open Forum Infect Dis. 2015 Oct 1;2(4):ofv119. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofv119. eCollection 2015 Dec. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 26430697 Free PMC article.
-
Improving quality and safety of care using "technovigilance": an ethnographic case study of secondary use of data from an electronic prescribing and decision support system.Milbank Q. 2013 Sep;91(3):424-54. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12021. Milbank Q. 2013. PMID: 24028694 Free PMC article.
-
Meaningful measurement: developing a measurement system to improve blood pressure control in patients with chronic kidney disease.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jun;20(e1):e97-e101. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001308. Epub 2013 Jan 23. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013. PMID: 23345408 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
