Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan 24;10:9.
doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-10-9.

Weight Science: Evaluating the Evidence for a Paradigm Shift

Free PMC article

Weight Science: Evaluating the Evidence for a Paradigm Shift

Linda Bacon et al. Nutr J. .
Free PMC article

Erratum in

  • Nutr J. 2011;10:69


Current guidelines recommend that "overweight" and "obese" individuals lose weight through engaging in lifestyle modification involving diet, exercise and other behavior change. This approach reliably induces short term weight loss, but the majority of individuals are unable to maintain weight loss over the long term and do not achieve the putative benefits of improved morbidity and mortality. Concern has arisen that this weight focus is not only ineffective at producing thinner, healthier bodies, but may also have unintended consequences, contributing to food and body preoccupation, repeated cycles of weight loss and regain, distraction from other personal health goals and wider health determinants, reduced self-esteem, eating disorders, other health decrement, and weight stigmatization and discrimination. This concern has drawn increased attention to the ethical implications of recommending treatment that may be ineffective or damaging. A growing trans-disciplinary movement called Health at Every Size (HAES) challenges the value of promoting weight loss and dieting behavior and argues for a shift in focus to weight-neutral outcomes. Randomized controlled clinical trials indicate that a HAES approach is associated with statistically and clinically relevant improvements in physiological measures (e.g., blood pressure, blood lipids), health behaviors (e.g., eating and activity habits, dietary quality), and psychosocial outcomes (such as self-esteem and body image), and that HAES achieves these health outcomes more successfully than weight loss treatment and without the contraindications associated with a weight focus. This paper evaluates the evidence and rationale that justifies shifting the health care paradigm from a conventional weight focus to HAES.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 77 articles

See all "Cited by" articles


    1. Marketdata Enterprises. The U.S. Weight Loss & Diet Control Market (10th Edition) Lynbrook. 2009.
    1. Monteath SA, McCabe MP. The influence of societal factors on female body image. J Soc Psychol. 1997;137:708–727. doi: 10.1080/00224549709595493. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neumark-Sztainer D, Rock CL, Thornquist MD, Cheskin LJ, Neuhouser ML, Barnett MJ. Weight-control behaviors among adults and adolescents: Associations with dietary intake. Prev Med. 2000;30:381–391. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0653. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jeffery RW, Adlis SA, Forster JL. Prevalence of dieting among working men and women: The Healthy Worker Project. Health Psychol. 1991;10:274–281. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.10.4.274. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mann T, Tomiyama AJ, Westling E, Lew AM, Samuels B, Chatman J. Medicare's Search for Effective Obesity Treatments: Diets Are Not the Answer. Am Psychol. 2007;62:220–233. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.3.220. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types