Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;204(4):338.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.11.029. Epub 2011 Jan 26.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the maximum time for cervical ripening (from 24-12 hours) would influence the efficacy of a transcervical Foley catheter and to compare efficacy to that of a prostaglandin E(2) vaginal insert.

Study design: Three hundred ninety-seven women were assigned randomly to (1) Foley catheter left in place for a maximum of 24 hours, (2) Foley catheter left in place for a maximum of 12 hours, or (3) prostaglandin E(2) controlled-release vaginal insert. Primary outcome was vaginal delivery within 24 hours.

Results: There were no differences in vaginal delivery rates. The proportion of women who achieved vaginal delivery in 24 hours was lower in the 24-hour Foley catheter group than in the other 2 groups (24-hour Foley catheter, 21.0%; 12-hour Foley catheter, 59.8%; vaginal prostaglandin E(2), 48.5%; P < .0001).

Conclusion: Cutting the ripening time with a Foley catheter by one-half increases the proportion of women who deliver vaginally within 24 hours and yields efficacy similar to that of prostaglandin E(2) vaginal insert.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Intravaginal
  • Adult
  • Catheterization*
  • Catheters*
  • Cervical Ripening*
  • Delivery, Obstetric
  • Dinoprostone / therapeutic use*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Labor, Induced
  • Oxytocics / therapeutic use*
  • Pregnancy
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Oxytocics
  • Dinoprostone