Outcomes of chest compression only CPR versus conventional CPR conducted by lay people in patients with out of hospital cardiopulmonary arrest witnessed by bystanders: nationwide population based observational study
- PMID: 21273279
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c7106
Outcomes of chest compression only CPR versus conventional CPR conducted by lay people in patients with out of hospital cardiopulmonary arrest witnessed by bystanders: nationwide population based observational study
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with chest compression only and conventional CPR on outcomes after cardiopulmonary arrest out of hospital.
Design: Nationwide population based observational study.
Setting: A nationwide emergency medical service system in Japan. Population All consecutive patients with out of hospital cardiopulmonary arrest, January 2005 to December 2007 in Japan, witnessed at the moment of collapse. Lay people attempted chest compression only CPR (n = 20,707) or conventional CPR (mouth to mouth ventilation and chest compression) (n = 19,328), and patients were transferred to hospital by ambulance.
Main outcome measures: Factors associated with better outcomes (assessed with χ(2), multiple logistic regression analysis, odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals): one month survival and neurologically favourable one month survival rates defined as category one (good cerebral performance) or two (moderate cerebral disability) of the cerebral performance categories.
Results: Conventional CPR was associated with better outcomes than chest compression only CPR, for both one month survival (adjusted odds ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.29) and neurologically favourable one month survival (1.17, 1.01 to 1.35). Neurologically favourable one month survival decreased with increasing age and with delays of up to 10 minutes in starting CPR for both conventional and chest compression only CPR. The benefit of conventional CPR over chest compression only CPR was significantly greater in younger people in non-cardiac cases (P = 0.025) and with a delay in start of CPR after the event was witnessed in non-cardiac cases (P = 0.015) and all cases combined (P = 0.037).
Conclusions: Conventional CPR is associated with better outcomes than chest compression only CPR for selected patients with out of hospital cardiopulmonary arrest, such as those with arrests of non-cardiac origin and younger people, and people in whom there was delay in the start of CPR.
Comment in
-
Chest compression or conventional CPR after out of hospital cardiac arrest?BMJ. 2011 Jan 27;342:d374. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d374. BMJ. 2011. PMID: 21273280 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with public-access defibrillation: a nationwide cohort study.Circulation. 2012 Dec 11;126(24):2844-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.109504. Circulation. 2012. PMID: 23230315
-
Impact of telephone dispatcher assistance on the outcomes of pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Crit Care Med. 2012 May;40(5):1410-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823e99ae. Crit Care Med. 2012. PMID: 22430245
-
Conventional and chest-compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation by bystanders for children who have out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: a prospective, nationwide, population-based cohort study.Lancet. 2010 Apr 17;375(9723):1347-54. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60064-5. Epub 2010 Mar 2. Lancet. 2010. PMID: 20202679
-
Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non-asphyxial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 27;3(3):CD010134. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010134.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28349529 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Chest compression-only cardiocerebral resuscitation.Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009 Jun;15(3):189-97. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283295f2c. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009. PMID: 19451816 Review.
Cited by
-
Prehospital predicting factors using a decision tree model for patients with witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and an initial shockable rhythm.Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 27;13(1):16180. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43106-w. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37758799 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in neurological outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: a population-based nationwide observational study.Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 May 2;36:100771. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100771. Online ahead of print. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023. PMID: 37360869 Free PMC article.
-
The interaction effect of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and dispatcher CPR on outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 27;12(1):22450. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-27096-9. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36575302 Free PMC article.
-
Different Resting Methods in Improving Laypersons Hands-Only Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality and Reducing Fatigue: A Randomized Crossover Study.Resusc Plus. 2021 Nov 12;8:100177. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100177. eCollection 2021 Dec. Resusc Plus. 2021. PMID: 34825237 Free PMC article.
-
Barrier resuscitation by lay rescuers during COVID-19 pandemic.Med Hypotheses. 2021 Sep;154:110648. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2021.110648. Epub 2021 Jul 29. Med Hypotheses. 2021. PMID: 34358920 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical