Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Aug;26(8):920-9.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1621-5. Epub 2011 Feb 8.

Conducting high-value secondary dataset analysis: an introductory guide and resources

Affiliations
Review

Conducting high-value secondary dataset analysis: an introductory guide and resources

Alexander K Smith et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Secondary analyses of large datasets provide a mechanism for researchers to address high impact questions that would otherwise be prohibitively expensive and time-consuming to study. This paper presents a guide to assist investigators interested in conducting secondary data analysis, including advice on the process of successful secondary data analysis as well as a brief summary of high-value datasets and online resources for researchers, including the SGIM dataset compendium ( www.sgim.org/go/datasets ). The same basic research principles that apply to primary data analysis apply to secondary data analysis, including the development of a clear and clinically relevant research question, study sample, appropriate measures, and a thoughtful analytic approach. A real-world case description illustrates key steps: (1) define your research topic and question; (2) select a dataset; (3) get to know your dataset; and (4) structure your analysis and presentation of findings in a way that is clinically meaningful. Secondary dataset analysis is a well-established methodology. Secondary analysis is particularly valuable for junior investigators, who have limited time and resources to demonstrate expertise and productivity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None disclosed.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mainous AG, 3rd, Hueston WJ. Using other people’s data: the ins and outs of secondary data analysis. Fam Med. 1997;29(8):568–571. - PubMed
    1. Doolan DM, Froelicher ES. Using an existing data set to answer new research questions: a methodological review. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2009;23(3):203–215. doi: 10.1891/1541-6577.23.3.203. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shlipak M, Stehman-Breen C. Observational research databases in renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(12):3477–3484. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005080806. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams BA, Lindquist K, Moody-Ayers SY, Walter LC, Covinsky KE. Functional impairment, race, and family expectations of death. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(11):1682–1687. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00941.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Steinman MA, Sands LP, Covinsky KE. Self-restriction of medications due to cost in seniors without prescription coverage. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(12):793–799. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.10412.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources