Comparing sexual assault prevalence estimates obtained with direct and indirect questioning techniques

Violence Against Women. 2011 Feb;17(2):219-35. doi: 10.1177/1077801210397743.

Abstract

Concerns have been expressed about the validity of self-reported data on sexual assault, as victims might be reluctant to disclose what happened to them. In this study, using an anonymous, web-based survey, a sample of 5,446 undergraduate women were asked about their experiences with physically forced sexual assault using both direct and indirect questioning methods. The prevalence of physically forced sexual assault obtained via indirect questioning was slightly higher than, though not substantially or statistically different from, the estimate obtained via direct questioning. The results suggest that either direct questioning yields reasonably valid estimates of the prevalence of sexual assault or that the item count technique does not produce estimates that are any more valid.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Crime Victims / statistics & numerical data*
  • Data Collection / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Prevalence
  • Rape / statistics & numerical data*
  • Self Report*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires*
  • Young Adult