In-hospital major bleeding during ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction care: derivation and validation of a model from the ACTION Registry®-GWTG™
- PMID: 21324428
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.12.009
In-hospital major bleeding during ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction care: derivation and validation of a model from the ACTION Registry®-GWTG™
Abstract
Bleeding, a common complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treatment, is associated with worse outcomes. A contemporary model for major bleeding associated with AMI treatment can stratify patients at elevated risk for bleeding and is needed to risk-adjust AMI practice and outcomes. Using the Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With the Guidelines (ACTION Registry-GWTG) database, an in-hospital major bleeding risk model was developed in a population of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The model used only baseline variables and was developed (n = 72,313) and validated (n = 17,960) in patients with AMI (at 251 United States centers from January 2007 to December 2008). The 12 most statistically and clinically significant variables were incorporated into the final regression model. The calibration plots are shown, and the model discrimination is demonstrated in derivation and validation cohorts, as well as across key subgroups. The rate of major bleeding in the overall population was 10.8%. The 12 factors associated with major bleeding in the model were heart rate, baseline hemoglobin, female gender, baseline serum creatinine, age, electrocardiographic changes, heart failure or shock, diabetes, peripheral artery disease, body weight, systolic blood pressure, and home warfarin use. The risk model discriminated well in the derivation (C-statistic = 0.73) and validation (C-statistic = 0.71) cohorts. A risk score for major bleeding corresponded well with observed bleeding: very low risk (3.9%), low risk (7.3%), moderate risk (16.1%), high risk (29.0%), and very high risk (39.8%). In conclusion, the ACTION Registry-GWTG in-hospital major bleeding model stratifies risk for major bleeding using variables at presentation and enables risk-adjusted bleeding outcomes for quality improvement initiatives and clinical decision making.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Contemporary risk model for inhospital major bleeding for patients with acute myocardial infarction: The acute coronary treatment and intervention outcomes network (ACTION) registry®-Get With The Guidelines (GWTG)®.Am Heart J. 2017 Dec;194:16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 12. Am Heart J. 2017. PMID: 29223432
-
A risk score to predict bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 8;55(23):2556-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.076. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20513595 Clinical Trial.
-
Admission international normalized ratio levels, early treatment strategies, and major bleeding risk among non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients on home warfarin therapy: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.Circulation. 2012 Mar 20;125(11):1414-23. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.059188. Epub 2012 Feb 8. Circulation. 2012. PMID: 22319105
-
Acute coronary care in the elderly, part I: Non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology.Circulation. 2007 May 15;115(19):2549-69. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.182615. Circulation. 2007. PMID: 17502590 Review.
-
Concomitant ST-elevation myocardial infarction and deep vein thrombosis in a patient with severe factor XII deficiency: case report and review of the literature.QJM. 2011 Dec;104(12):1083-6. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcq221. Epub 2010 Nov 23. QJM. 2011. PMID: 21106502 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Impact of the Japanese Version of High Bleeding Risk Criteria on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.J Atheroscler Thromb. 2024 Jun 1;31(6):917-930. doi: 10.5551/jat.64445. Epub 2023 Dec 14. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2024. PMID: 38092385 Free PMC article.
-
Paired risk scores to predict ischaemic and bleeding risk twenty-eight days to one year after an acute coronary syndrome.Heart. 2023 Nov 27;109(24):1827-1836. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2023-322830. Heart. 2023. PMID: 37558394 Free PMC article.
-
The Management and Antithrombotic Strategies of Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and High Bleeding Risk.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Jul;25(7):669-680. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01893-8. Epub 2023 Jun 7. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023. PMID: 37285104 Review.
-
Comparison between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in myocardial infarction patients with high bleeding risk.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2023 Nov 2;9(7):627-635. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad041. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2023. PMID: 37263787 Free PMC article.
-
A Small Increase in Serum Creatinine within 48 h of Hospital Admission Is an Independent Predictor of In-Hospital Adverse Outcomes in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Findings from the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in the China Project.Cardiol Res Pract. 2023 Mar 28;2023:1374206. doi: 10.1155/2023/1374206. eCollection 2023. Cardiol Res Pract. 2023. PMID: 37025394 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
