Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Jul;26(7):691-7.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1639-3. Epub 2011 Feb 15.

Improving the follow-up of positive hemoccult screening tests: an electronic intervention

Linda L Humphrey  1 , Jackilen Shannon, Melissa R Partin, Jean O'Malley, Zunqiu Chen, Mark Helfand
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Improving the follow-up of positive hemoccult screening tests: an electronic intervention

Linda L Humphrey et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Four population-based studies of screening for CRC with fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) have shown that mortality can be significantly reduced. However, nearly half of all positive screening tests are not appropriately evaluated.

Objectives: We evaluated whether an electronic record intervention improved the follow-up of patients with a positive FOBT (FOBT+) result.

Design: We conducted a cluster randomized trial involving four Veteran's Affairs (VA) medical centers pair-matched by colonoscopy volume and randomized within the pair to receive the electronic intervention or usual care.

Participants: All patients with FOBT+ results at participating facilities during a matched pre- and post-intervention time period.

Interventions: In the two intervention sites, an electronic consult that imported relevant clinical information was automatically submitted to the gastroenterology (GI) clinic for all FOBT+ patients at the time the result was recorded in the laboratory. In both intervention and control sites (usual care), PCPs continued to be notified of FOBT+ results in the usual manner

Measures: Pre- and post-intervention changes in the proportion of FOBT+ patients having: (1) a GI consult or (2) a GI consult plus complete diagnostic evaluation (CDE) of the colon within 30, 90 and 180 days were compared across intervention and control sites. Log rank tests were used to determine statistical significance.

Results: The 30-, 90- and 180-day GI consult rates improved 21-33 % (p < 0.001) among intervention sites, but did not change in the usual care sites. Thirty-, 90- and 180-day CDE rates improved 9-31% (p < 0.03) in intervention sites, but did not significantly change in the usual care sites. Time to GI consult and CDE decreased significantly over time in the intervention sites (p < 0.001), but remained unchanged in the usual care sites.

Conclusions: The relatively simple electronic intervention evaluated can significantly improve the follow-up of FOBT+ results. Interventions such as this could improve patient care and may be applicable to other practice settings, as well as other types of tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of FOBT+ consult template.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Trial design.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Flow of participants in the trial.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Log rank analysis of the time to a GI consultation following a positive FOBT.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Log rank analysis of the time to completion of both a GI consultation and an anatomical assessment following a positive FOBT.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59(4):225–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.20006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(5):1570–1595. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(19):1365–1371. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199305133281901. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996;348(9040):1472–1477. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03386-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondergaard O. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet. 1996;348(9040):1467–1471. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03430-7. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types