Selection of drug-laboratory result pairs for an inpatient asynchronous alert program: results of a Delphi survey
- PMID: 21330682
- DOI: 10.2146/ajhp100215
Selection of drug-laboratory result pairs for an inpatient asynchronous alert program: results of a Delphi survey
Abstract
Purpose: Combinations of drugs and laboratory values ("drug-laboratory pairs") that represent practical high-priority targets for potential use in a daily asynchronous inpatient clinical decision-support (CDS) alert report were identified.
Methods: A list of 654 drug-laboratory pairs compiled through a literature review was evaluated by a multidisciplinary expert panel in a modified Delphi procedure. After initial evaluation to narrow the list to 89 drug-laboratory pairs, panelists used Likert scales to rate the remaining pairs on six dimensions (frequency of alert, likelihood of harm, severity of harm, preventability, ameliorability, and global impression of usefulness) in Delphi survey rounds until consensus emerged. Final selection of pairs for potential use as CDS tools was based on global-impression-of-usefulness scores. Correlations between impression of usefulness and other evaluative dimensions were determined.
Results: The Delphi process yielded a final list of 24 high-priority drug-laboratory pairs. The highest-ranked pairs were heparin- low platelet count, potassium supplement- high serum potassium, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor-high serum potassium, and heparin-positive heparin platelet factor 4 antibody test. Medications on the final list included nine anticoagulants, six cardiologic agents, four antimicrobials, and two electrolytes. Most of the selected drug-laboratory pairs related to renal function, serum potassium levels, hematologic results, or pregnancy. Panelists' impression of usefulness was significantly correlated with severity-of-harm ratings (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: Expert review of drug- laboratory value pairs for potential inclusion in an asynchronous monitoring program yielded 24 high-priority and practical pairs for monitoring. About 25% of the pairs had not been the focus of previous laboratory-pharmacy CDS at the study panelists' home institutions.
Similar articles
-
High-alert medications for pediatric patients: an international modified Delphi study.Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2013 Nov;12(6):805-14. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2013.825247. Epub 2013 Aug 10. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2013. PMID: 23931332
-
Developing consensus on hospital prescribing indicators of potential harm for infants and children.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Aug;82(2):451-60. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12954. Epub 2016 May 18. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016. PMID: 27038331 Free PMC article.
-
Developing consensus on hospital prescribing indicators of potential harms amenable to decision support.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Nov;76(5):797-809. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12087. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013. PMID: 23362926 Free PMC article.
-
Use of computer decision support interventions to improve medication prescribing in older adults: a systematic review.Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2008 Jun;6(2):119-29. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2008.06.001. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2008. PMID: 18675770 Review.
-
The effect of prescriber education on medication-related patient harm in the hospital: a systematic review.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 May;83(5):953-961. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13200. Epub 2017 Jan 12. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017. PMID: 27918623 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Identifying potential prescribing safety indicators related to mental health disorders and medications: A systematic review.PLoS One. 2019 May 24;14(5):e0217406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217406. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31125358 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
