The role of the c-statistic in variable selection for propensity score models
- PMID: 21351315
- PMCID: PMC3081361
- DOI: 10.1002/pds.2074
The role of the c-statistic in variable selection for propensity score models
Abstract
The applied literature on propensity scores has often cited the c-statistic as a measure of the ability of the propensity score to control confounding. However, a high c-statistic in the propensity model is neither necessary nor sufficient for control of confounding. Moreover, use of the c-statistic as a guide in constructing propensity scores may result in less overlap in propensity scores between treated and untreated subjects; this may require the analyst to restrict populations for inference. Such restrictions may reduce precision of estimates and change the population to which the estimate applies. Variable selection based on prior subject matter knowledge, empirical observation, and sensitivity analysis is preferable and avoids many of these problems.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.Stat Med. 2007 Feb 20;26(4):734-53. doi: 10.1002/sim.2580. Stat Med. 2007. PMID: 16708349
-
Indications for propensity scores and review of their use in pharmacoepidemiology.Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006 Mar;98(3):253-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2006.pto_293.x. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006. PMID: 16611199 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Too much ado about propensity score models? Comparing methods of propensity score matching.Value Health. 2006 Nov-Dec;9(6):377-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00130.x. Value Health. 2006. PMID: 17076868
-
Ten things to remember about propensity scores.Eur J Endocrinol. 2024 Jul 2;191(1):E1-E4. doi: 10.1093/ejendo/lvae067. Eur J Endocrinol. 2024. PMID: 38872400 Review.
-
Prognostic score-based balance measures can be a useful diagnostic for propensity score methods in comparative effectiveness research.J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;66(8 Suppl):S84-S90.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.01.013. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 23849158 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Prognostic score-based model averaging approach for propensity score estimation.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Oct 3;24(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02350-y. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024. PMID: 39363252 Free PMC article.
-
Vaccine patterns among older adults with Guillain-Barré syndrome and matched comparators, 2006-2019.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Oct;72(10):3055-3067. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19110. Epub 2024 Aug 1. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024. PMID: 39090827
-
Impact of Early Rehabilitation after Endovascular Treatment for Peripheral Arterial Disease.Prog Rehabil Med. 2024 Jun 8;9:20240021. doi: 10.2490/prm.20240021. eCollection 2024. Prog Rehabil Med. 2024. PMID: 38855421 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of a computable phenotype for Turner syndrome utilizing electronic health records from a national pediatric network.Am J Med Genet A. 2024 Apr;194(4):e63495. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63495. Epub 2023 Dec 8. Am J Med Genet A. 2024. PMID: 38066696
-
Tobacco quitline performance: Comparing the impacts of early cessation and proactive re-engagement on callers' smoking status at follow-up at 12 months.Tob Induc Dis. 2023 Feb 15;21:24. doi: 10.18332/tid/159125. eCollection 2023. Tob Induc Dis. 2023. PMID: 36798676 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Stürmer T, Joshi M, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Rothman KJ, Schneeweiss S. A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(5):437–47. - PubMed
-
- Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70(1):41–55.
-
- D’Agostino RB., Jr Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17(19):2265–81. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- T32 AI007001-32/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- AG-027400/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- T32 AI007001/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- R01 AG018833/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- K99-HD-06-3961/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- R01 AG023178/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- K99 HD063961/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- R00 HD063961/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- K99 HD063961-01/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- K25 AG027400/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- T32-AI-07001/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- K02 HS017950/HS/AHRQ HHS/United States
- K02 HS17950/HS/AHRQ HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
