Comparative effectiveness research: guidelines for good practices are just the beginning
- PMID: 21351858
- DOI: 10.1586/erp.10.93
Comparative effectiveness research: guidelines for good practices are just the beginning
Abstract
The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research formed a task force to gather state-of-the-art recommendations on good research practices for comparative effectiveness research using retrospective databases. The report of the task force was published in three sections in the journal Value in Health in December 2009, and addressed issues of design, analysis, framing the research question, and reporting and interpreting the findings from nonrandomized studies of treatment effects. This article will briefly examine the structure, process and outcomes of that task force, comment on the potential impact of the report in the context of comparative effectiveness research, and offer a few observations on the future of this field.
Similar articles
-
Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part I.Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1044-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00600.x. Epub 2009 Sep 29. Value Health. 2009. PMID: 19793072
-
Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: approaches to mitigate bias and confounding in the design of nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part II.Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1053-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00601.x. Epub 2009 Sep 10. Value Health. 2009. PMID: 19744292
-
The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1086-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00605.x. Epub 2009 Sep 10. Value Health. 2009. PMID: 19744291
-
Good research practices for cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials: the ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force report.Value Health. 2005 Sep-Oct;8(5):521-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.00045.x. Value Health. 2005. PMID: 16176491 Review.
-
Methodological issues in comparative effectiveness research: clinical trials.Am J Med. 2010 Dec;123(12 Suppl 1):e8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.003. Am J Med. 2010. PMID: 21184867 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative effectiveness research of chronic hepatitis B and C cohort study (CHeCS): improving data collection and cohort identification.Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Dec;59(12):3053-61. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3272-6. Epub 2014 Jul 17. Dig Dis Sci. 2014. PMID: 25030940 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources