The importance of touch in development
- PMID: 21358895
- PMCID: PMC2865952
- DOI: 10.1093/pch/15.3.153
The importance of touch in development
Abstract
Developmental delay is common in children deprived of normal sensory stimulation - for example, in premature neonates and some institutionalized children. Touch has emerged as an important modality for the facilitation of growth and development; positive effects of supplemental mechanosensory stimulation have been demonstrated in a wide range of organisms, from worm larvae to rat pups to human infants. Animal models are being used to elucidate the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying these effects. In rats, the amount of maternal licking received as a pup has a profound impact on the behaviour and physiology of the adult; in the microscopic roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans, physical interactions with other worms promote growth and increase adult responsiveness to mechanosensory stimuli. By understanding the underlying mechanisms, as well as the timing and degree of stimulation required to fully reverse the effects of early childhood deprivation, strategies can be developed to best help those in need.
Le retard de développement est courant chez les enfants privés de stimulation sensorielle normale, par exemple, chez les nouveau-nés prématurés et certains enfants institutionnalisés. Le toucher a émergé comme une modalité importante pour favoriser la croissance et le développement. Les effets positifs d’une stimulation mécanosensorielle supplémentaire sont démontrés chez toute une série d’organismes, des larves de vers aux nourrissons humains en passant par les ratons. On utilise des modèles animaux pour élucider les mécanismes cellulaires et moléculaires à l’origine de ces effets. Chez les rats, la quantité de léchage que reçoit le raton de sa mère a d’importantes répercussions sur son comportement et sa physiologie à l’âge adulte. Chez les nématodes Caenorhabditis elegans microscopiques, les interactions physiques avec d’autres vers favorisent la croissance et augmentent la réceptivité de l’adulte aux stimuli mécanosensoriels. Si on comprend les mécanismes sous-jacents, le moment et le degré de stimulation nécessaires pour supprimer entièrement les effets d’une privation pendant la première enfance, on pourra élaborer des stratégies pour aider les enfants dans le besoin.
Keywords: Caenorhabditis elegans; Kangaroo mother care; Maternal patterns of care; Preterm birth; Rats; Sense of touch.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Responses to maternal separation: mechanisms and mediators.Int J Dev Neurosci. 1998 Jun-Jul;16(3-4):261-70. doi: 10.1016/s0736-5748(98)00034-3. Int J Dev Neurosci. 1998. PMID: 9785122 Review.
-
Sensory deprivation stress and supplemental stimulation in the rat pup and preterm human neonate.Child Dev. 1987 Dec;58(6):1431-47. Child Dev. 1987. PMID: 3691193
-
Decreased sensory stimulation reduces behavioral responding, retards development, and alters neuronal connectivity in Caenorhabditis elegans.J Neurosci. 2005 Aug 3;25(31):7159-68. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1833-05.2005. J Neurosci. 2005. PMID: 16079398 Free PMC article.
-
Positive effects of tactile versus kinesthetic or vestibular stimulation on neuroendocrine and ODC activity in maternally-deprived rat pups.Life Sci. 1986 Dec 1;39(22):2081-7. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(86)90359-0. Life Sci. 1986. PMID: 3491272
-
Mechanosensation circuitry in Caenorhabditis elegans: A focus on gentle touch.Peptides. 2015 Jun;68:164-74. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2014.12.004. Epub 2014 Dec 25. Peptides. 2015. PMID: 25543196 Review.
Cited by
-
Congenital absence of touch does not preclude normal cognitive and socioemotional development.Res Sq [Preprint]. 2024 Aug 7:rs.3.rs-4791322. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4791322/v1. Res Sq. 2024. PMID: 39149458 Free PMC article. Preprint.
-
A systematic review and multivariate meta-analysis of the physical and mental health benefits of touch interventions.Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Jun;8(6):1088-1107. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01841-8. Epub 2024 Apr 8. Nat Hum Behav. 2024. PMID: 38589702 Free PMC article.
-
Losing your touch? Sustained inattentional numbness for dynamic tactile events.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Apr;49(4):566-572. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001092. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023. PMID: 37184939 Free PMC article.
-
The relational ontology of mobile touchscreens and the body: Ambient proprioception and risk during COVID-19.Mob Media Commun. 2023 May;11(2):312-327. doi: 10.1177/20501579221117434. Epub 2022 Sep 1. Mob Media Commun. 2023. PMID: 37124149 Free PMC article.
-
A working taxonomy for describing the sensory differences of autism.Mol Autism. 2023 Apr 11;14(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13229-022-00534-1. Mol Autism. 2023. PMID: 37041612 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Frank DA, Klass PE, Earls F, Eisenberg L. Infants and young children in orphanages: One view from pediatrics and child psychiatry. Pediatrics. 1996;97:569–78. - PubMed
-
- Hopper HE, Pinneau SR. Frequency of regurgitation in infancy as related to the amount of stimulation received from the mother. Child Dev. 1957;28:229–35. - PubMed
-
- Casler L. The effects of extra tactile stimulation on a group of institutionalized infants. Genet Psychol Monogr. 1965;71:137–75. - PubMed
-
- Field T, Schanberg SM, Scafidi F, et al. Effects of tactile/kinesthetic stimulation on preterm neonates. Pediatrics. 1986;77:654–8. - PubMed
-
- Scafidi F, Field T, Schanberg SM, et al. Effects of tactile/kinesthetic stimulation and sleep/wake behavior of preterm neonates. Infant Behav Dev. 1986;9:91–105.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources