Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Mar;127(3):1255-1262.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182043af6.

Current national incidence, trends, and health care resource utilization of cleft lip-cleft palate

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Current national incidence, trends, and health care resource utilization of cleft lip-cleft palate

Benjamin Basseri et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Available reports on the epidemiology of cleft lip, cleft palate, and cleft lip-cleft palate have been numerous yet inconsistent, and have originated only from institutional or regional studies. The need for current national data and the recognition of recent trends exists.

Methods: The authors examined the Kids' Inpatient Database to obtain national information on pediatric orofacial cleft discharges from 1997 to 2007. The authors examined patient and hospital characteristics to discern differences in use of care, hospital charges, type of hospital, untoward events, and other variables among various groups. A detailed investigation searching for significant trends during the 6-year study period was also conducted.

Results: Trends appreciated from 1997 to 2007 included (1) an increase in cleft operations performed at teaching hospitals compared with nonteaching hospitals (teaching increased 13.4 percent and nonteaching decreased 15.8 percent); (2) an increase in the mean overall charges (74.5 percent increase; p < 0.001) and a rate of rise higher than that of aggregate charges (60 percent; p < 0.001); and (3) a lower rate of perioperative complications in teaching hospitals from 2000 to 2007, ranging from 14 to 27 percent less than in nonteaching hospitals.

Conclusions: The authors' data show that there is a current trend of cleft patients receiving treatment at teaching hospitals, with higher costs and decreasing complications. An understanding of such trends and disparities in resource use among various patient, hospital, and geographic settings is important for physicians and policy makers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Little J, Cardy A, Arslan MT, Gilmour M, Mossey PA; United Kingdom-based case-control study. Smoking and orofacial clefts: A United Kingdom-based case-control study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004;41:381–386.
    1. Pham AM, Senders CW. Management of bilateral cleft lip and nasal deformity. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;14:278–282.
    1. Tolarová MM, Cervenka J. Classification and birth prevalence of orofacial clefts. Am J Med Genet. 1998;75:126–137.
    1. Berkowitz S. Cleft Lip and Palate: Diagnosis and Management. New York: Springer; 2006:1–799.
    1. Williams CA, Mardon RE, Grove D, Wharton P, Hauser KW, Frias JL. Treatment of oralfacial clefts by state-affiliated craniofacial centers and cleft palate clinics. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2003;64:643–646.

LinkOut - more resources