Dynamic contrast enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for differential diagnosis in head and neck cancers

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Apr;81(4):784-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.089. Epub 2011 Mar 3.

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the potential of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for differential diagnosis of head and neck cancer.

Methods and materials: DCE-MRI was performed in 26 patients with untreated squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 28 undifferentiated carcinoma (UD) and 8 lymphoma. DCE-MRI was analyzed with the pharmacokinetic model proposed by Tofts and Kermode to produce the three DCE parameters: k(trans), v(e) and v(p). Areas under the curve (AUC) at the initial 60 and 90s (AUC60 and AUC90) were also recorded. Histogram analysis was conducted to obtain the mean, 25%, 50%, 75% and 95% percentile values and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the DCE parameters between the three groups of cancer.

Results: k(trans), AUC60 and AUC90 showed significant differences (p<0.01) between UD/SCC and UD/lymphoma, but not between SCC/lymphoma. The mean AUC90 demonstrated the highest accuracy of 78% (sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 88%) for distinguishing UD and SCC, and the 75% percentile AUC90 provided the highest accuracy of 97% (sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 88.5%) for distinguishing UD and lymphoma.

Conclusions: There are significant differences in the DCE parameters which show the potential for distinguishing UD from SCC or lymphoma.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Carcinoma / pathology*
  • Contrast Media
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Female
  • Head and Neck Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Humans
  • Lymphoma / pathology*
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Contrast Media