Protein complexes are central in the yeast genetic landscape
- PMID: 21390331
- PMCID: PMC3044758
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001092
Protein complexes are central in the yeast genetic landscape
Abstract
If perturbing two genes together has a stronger or weaker effect than expected, they are said to genetically interact. Genetic interactions are important because they help map gene function, and functionally related genes have similar genetic interaction patterns. Mapping quantitative (positive and negative) genetic interactions on a global scale has recently become possible. This data clearly shows groups of genes connected by predominantly positive or negative interactions, termed monochromatic groups. These groups often correspond to functional modules, like biological processes or complexes, or connections between modules. However it is not yet known how these patterns globally relate to known functional modules. Here we systematically study the monochromatic nature of known biological processes using the largest quantitative genetic interaction data set available, which includes fitness measurements for ∼5.4 million gene pairs in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We find that only 10% of biological processes, as defined by Gene Ontology annotations, and less than 1% of inter-process connections are monochromatic. Further, we show that protein complexes are responsible for a surprisingly large fraction of these patterns. This suggests that complexes play a central role in shaping the monochromatic landscape of biological processes. Altogether this work shows that both positive and negative monochromatic patterns are found in known biological processes and in their connections and that protein complexes play an important role in these patterns. The monochromatic processes, complexes and connections we find chart a hierarchical and modular map of sensitive and redundant biological systems in the yeast cell that will be useful for gene function prediction and comparison across phenotypes and organisms. Furthermore the analysis methods we develop are applicable to other species for which genetic interactions will progressively become more available.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The genetic landscape of a cell.Science. 2010 Jan 22;327(5964):425-31. doi: 10.1126/science.1180823. Science. 2010. PMID: 20093466 Free PMC article.
-
A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function.Science. 2016 Sep 23;353(6306):aaf1420. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf1420. Science. 2016. PMID: 27708008 Free PMC article.
-
Recursive expectation-maximization clustering: a method for identifying buffering mechanisms composed of phenomic modules.Chaos. 2010 Jun;20(2):026103. doi: 10.1063/1.3455188. Chaos. 2010. PMID: 20590332 Free PMC article.
-
Zooming in on yeast osmoadaptation.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;736:293-310. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7210-1_17. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012. PMID: 22161336 Review.
-
Interaction networks: lessons from large-scale studies in yeast.Proteomics. 2009 Oct;9(20):4799-811. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200900177. Proteomics. 2009. PMID: 19743423 Review.
Cited by
-
Dissecting the Characteristics and Dynamics of Human Protein Complexes at Transcriptome Cascade Using RNA-Seq Data.PLoS One. 2013 Jun 18;8(6):e66521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066521. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23824284 Free PMC article.
-
The Hsp90 Chaperone Network Modulates Candida Virulence Traits.Trends Microbiol. 2017 Oct;25(10):809-819. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 23. Trends Microbiol. 2017. PMID: 28549824 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Emerging and evolving concepts in gene essentiality.Nat Rev Genet. 2018 Jan;19(1):34-49. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2017.74. Epub 2017 Oct 16. Nat Rev Genet. 2018. PMID: 29033457 Review.
-
Emergence and propagation of epistasis in metabolic networks.Elife. 2021 Feb 2;10:e60200. doi: 10.7554/eLife.60200. Elife. 2021. PMID: 33527897 Free PMC article.
-
Modular biological function is most effectively captured by combining molecular interaction data types.PLoS One. 2013 May 3;8(5):e62670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062670. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23658761 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Giaever G, Chu AM, Ni L, Connelly C, Riles L, et al. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature. 2002;418:387–391. - PubMed
-
- Tong AH, Evangelista M, Parsons AB, Xu H, Bader GD, et al. Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science. 2001;294:2364–2368. - PubMed
-
- Schuldiner M, Collins SR, Thompson NJ, Denic V, Bhamidipati A, et al. Exploration of the function and organization of the yeast early secretory pathway through an epistatic miniarray profile. Cell. 2005;123:507–519. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
