Ontario multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography study: field evaluation of diagnostic accuracy
- PMID: 21403014
- DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.74
Ontario multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography study: field evaluation of diagnostic accuracy
Abstract
Background: Computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) has gained clinical acceptance for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease. Although single-center studies have demonstrated excellent accuracy, multicenter studies have yielded variable results. The true diagnostic accuracy of CTCA in the "real world" remains uncertain. We conducted a field evaluation comparing multidetector CTCA with invasive CA (ICA) to understand CTCA's diagnostic accuracy in a real-world setting.
Methods: A multicenter cohort study of patients awaiting ICA was conducted between September 2006 and June 2009. All patients had either a low or an intermediate pretest probability for coronary artery disease and underwent CTCA and ICA within 10 days. The results of CTCA and ICA were interpreted visually by local expert observers who were blinded to all clinical data and imaging results.
Results: Using a patient-based analysis (diameter stenosis ≥50%) of 169 patients, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 81.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71.0%-89.1%), 93.3% (95% CI, 85.9%-97.5%), 91.6% (95% CI, 82.5%-96.8%), and 84.7% (95% CI, 76.0%-91.2%), respectively; the area under receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.873. The diagnostic accuracy varied across centers (P < .001), with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value ranging from 50.0% to 93.2%, 92.0% to 100%, 84.6% to 100%, and 42.9% to 94.7%, respectively.
Conclusions: Compared with ICA, CTCA appears to have good accuracy; however, there was variability in diagnostic accuracy across centers. Factors affecting institutional variability need to be better understood before CTCA is universally adopted. Additional real-world evaluations are needed to fully understand the impact of CTCA on clinical care.
Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00371891.
Comment in
-
Gone fishing!: on the "real-world" accuracy of computed tomographic coronary angiography: Comment on the "Ontario multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography study".Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jun 13;171(11):1029-31. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.75. Epub 2011 Mar 14. Arch Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 21403008 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 18;52(21):1724-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.031. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008. PMID: 19007693 Clinical Trial.
-
Positive predictive value of computed tomography coronary angiography in clinical practice.Int J Cardiol. 2012 May 3;156(3):315-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.11.008. Epub 2010 Dec 31. Int J Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 21195491
-
Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of noninvasive testing for coronary artery disease.Ann Intern Med. 2010 May 18;152(10):630-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-10-201005180-00003. Ann Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20479028
-
CTCA for detection of significant coronary artery disease in routine TAVI work-up : A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neth Heart J. 2018 Dec;26(12):591-599. doi: 10.1007/s12471-018-1149-6. Neth Heart J. 2018. PMID: 30178209 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Computed Tomography for Suspected Coronary Artery Disease [Internet].Stockholm: Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU); 2011 Apr 13. SBU Alert Report No. 2011-03. Stockholm: Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU); 2011 Apr 13. SBU Alert Report No. 2011-03. PMID: 26153595 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Positive Predictive Value of Computerized Tomography Coronary Angiography versus Computerized Tomography Fractional Flow Reserve in a Real-world Population.Heart Views. 2024 Jan-Mar;25(1):2-8. doi: 10.4103/heartviews.heartviews_82_23. Epub 2024 Apr 12. Heart Views. 2024. PMID: 38774553 Free PMC article.
-
Chest Pain Evaluation: Diagnostic Testing.CJC Open. 2023 Sep 7;5(12):891-903. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.09.001. eCollection 2023 Dec. CJC Open. 2023. PMID: 38204849 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical impact of CT coronary angiography without exclusion of small coronary artery segments: a real-world and long-term study.Open Heart. 2020 May;7(1):e001222. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001222. Open Heart. 2020. PMID: 32385115 Free PMC article.
-
Coronary CT in Australia has high positive predictive value unaffected by site volume: An analysis of 510 positive CTCA scans with invasive angiographic correlation.Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2018 Aug 18;20:46-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2018.03.005. eCollection 2018 Sep. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2018. PMID: 30148201 Free PMC article.
-
Highly sensitive troponin and coronary computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of suspected acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department.Eur Heart J. 2016 Aug 7;37(30):2397-405. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw005. Epub 2016 Feb 2. Eur Heart J. 2016. PMID: 26843275 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
