Comparative effectiveness of goal setting in diabetes mellitus group clinics: randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 21403042
- PMCID: PMC3132209
- DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.70
Comparative effectiveness of goal setting in diabetes mellitus group clinics: randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) group clinics can effectively control hypertension, but data to support glycemic control are equivocal. This study evaluated the comparative effectiveness of 2 DM group clinic interventions on glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) levels in primary care.
Methods: Eighty-seven participants were recruited from a DM registry of a single regional Veterans Affairs medical center to participate in an open, randomized comparative effectiveness study. Two primary care-based DM group interventions of 3 months' duration were compared. Empowering Patients in Care (EPIC) was a clinician-led, patient-centered group clinic consisting of 4 sessions on setting self-management action plans (diet, exercise, home monitoring, medications, etc) and communicating about progress with action plans. The comparison intervention consisted of group education sessions with a DM educator and dietician followed by an additional visit with one's primary care provider. Hemoglobin A(1c) levels were compared after intervention and at the 1-year follow-up.
Results: Participants in the EPIC intervention had significantly greater improvements in HbA(1c) levels immediately following the active intervention (8.86%-8.04% vs 8.74%-8.70% of total hemoglobin; mean [SD] between-group difference 0.67% [1.3%]; P=.03), and these differences persisted at the 1 year follow-up (0.59% [1.4%], P=.05). A repeated-measures analysis using all study time points found a significant time-by-treatment interaction effect on HbA(1c) levels favoring the EPIC intervention (F(2,85)=3.55; P=.03). The effect of the time-by-treatment interaction seems to be partially mediated by DM self-efficacy (F(1,85)=10.39; P=.002).
Conclusion: Primary care-based DM group clinics that include structured goal-setting approaches to self-management can significantly improve HbA(1c) levels after intervention and maintain improvements for 1 year. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00481286.
©2011 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The effect of a structured behavioral intervention on poorly controlled diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.Arch Intern Med. 2011 Dec 12;171(22):1990-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.502. Epub 2011 Oct 10. Arch Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 21986346 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Medical clinics versus usual care for patients with both diabetes and hypertension: a randomized trial.Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jun 1;152(11):689-96. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00001. Ann Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20513826 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of Collaborative Goal Setting With Enhanced Education for Managing Diabetes-Associated Distress and Hemoglobin A1c Levels: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e229975. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.9975. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 35507345 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Physical activity advice only or structured exercise training and association with HbA1c levels in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JAMA. 2011 May 4;305(17):1790-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.576. JAMA. 2011. PMID: 21540423 Review.
-
Diabetes management in the primary care setting: summary.Am J Med. 2002 Oct 28;113 Suppl 6A:36S-40S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01279-2. Am J Med. 2002. PMID: 12431760 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Effectiveness of shared decision-making for glycaemic control among type 2 diabetes mellitus adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2024 Jul 31;19(7):e0306296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306296. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39083503 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancing healthcare access for an older population: The age-friendly emergency department.J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 May 8;5(3):e13182. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13182. eCollection 2024 Jun. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024. PMID: 38726466 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Shared Decision-Making in Cardiovascular Risk Factor Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e243779. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3779. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38530311 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of shared medical appointments delivered in primary care for improving health outcomes in patients with long-term conditions: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 7;14(3):e067252. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067252. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38453205 Free PMC article.
-
5. Facilitating Positive Health Behaviors and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(Suppl 1):S77-S110. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S005. Diabetes Care. 2024. PMID: 38078584 Review.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control. National Diabetes Fact Sheet: general information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States 2007. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers of Disease Control an Prevention; 2008. pp. 7–1–2010.
-
- Piette JD, Kerr EA. The impact of comorbid chronic conditions on diabetes care. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:725–731. - PubMed
-
- Wolff JL, Starfield B, Anderson G. Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2269–2276. - PubMed
-
- Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, Schmid CH, Engelgau MM. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1159–1171. - PubMed
-
- Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. JAMA. 2002;288:1909–1914. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
