Dalteparin versus unfractionated heparin in critically ill patients
- PMID: 21417952
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1014475
Dalteparin versus unfractionated heparin in critically ill patients
Abstract
Background: The effects of thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin, as compared with unfractionated heparin, on venous thromboembolism, bleeding, and other outcomes are uncertain in critically ill patients.
Methods: In this multicenter trial, we tested the superiority of dalteparin over unfractionated heparin by randomly assigning 3764 patients to receive either subcutaneous dalteparin (at a dose of 5000 IU once daily) plus placebo once daily (for parallel-group twice-daily injections) or unfractionated heparin (at a dose of 5000 IU twice daily) while they were in the intensive care unit. The primary outcome, proximal leg deep-vein thrombosis, was diagnosed on compression ultrasonography performed within 2 days after admission, twice weekly, and as clinically indicated. Additional testing for venous thromboembolism was performed as clinically indicated. Data were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle.
Results: There was no significant between-group difference in the rate of proximal leg deep-vein thrombosis, which occurred in 96 of 1873 patients (5.1%) receiving dalteparin versus 109 of 1873 patients (5.8%) receiving unfractionated heparin (hazard ratio in the dalteparin group, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68 to 1.23; P=0.57). The proportion of patients with pulmonary emboli was significantly lower with dalteparin (24 patients, 1.3%) than with unfractionated heparin (43 patients, 2.3%) (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.88; P=0.01). There was no significant between-group difference in the rates of major bleeding (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.34; P=0.98) or death in the hospital (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.05; P=0.21). In prespecified per-protocol analyses, the results were similar to those of the main analyses, but fewer patients receiving dalteparin had heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.98; P=0.046).
Conclusions: Among critically ill patients, dalteparin was not superior to unfractionated heparin in decreasing the incidence of proximal deep-vein thrombosis. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; PROTECT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00182143.).
Comment in
-
Dalteparin in critically ill patients.N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 14;365(2):179-80; author reply 180. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1105423. N Engl J Med. 2011. PMID: 21751919 No abstract available.
-
Dalteparin in critically ill patients.N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 14;365(2):179; author reply 180. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1105423. N Engl J Med. 2011. PMID: 21751920 No abstract available.
-
ACP Journal Club. Dalteparin did not differ from unfractionated heparin for reducing proximal DVT in critically ill patients.Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):JC1-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-02007. Ann Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 21768573 No abstract available.
-
Dalteparin and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 22;365(12):1158; author reply 1158. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1108392. N Engl J Med. 2011. PMID: 21992138 No abstract available.
-
Does dalteparin PROTECT better than heparin?Crit Care. 2011;15(6):315. doi: 10.1186/cc10581. Epub 2011 Dec 8. Crit Care. 2011. PMID: 22152126 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of dalteparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients.Circulation. 2004 Aug 17;110(7):874-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138928.83266.24. Epub 2004 Aug 2. Circulation. 2004. PMID: 15289368 Clinical Trial.
-
Low-molecular-weight heparin versus a coumarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer.N Engl J Med. 2003 Jul 10;349(2):146-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa025313. N Engl J Med. 2003. PMID: 12853587 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of a low-molecular-weight heparin on thrombus regression and recurrent thromboembolism in patients with deep-vein thrombosis.N Engl J Med. 2001 Mar 1;344(9):626-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103013440902. N Engl J Med. 2001. PMID: 11228276 Clinical Trial.
-
Meta-analysis of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medically Ill patients.Clin Ther. 2007 Nov;29(11):2395-405. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.11.015. Clin Ther. 2007. PMID: 18158080 Review.
-
Risk assessment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in acutely and/or critically ill patients.Haemostasis. 2000;30 Suppl 2:77-81; discussion 63. doi: 10.1159/000054168. Haemostasis. 2000. PMID: 11251346 Review.
Cited by
-
Pulmonary Embolism in Critically Ill Patients-Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 3;14(19):2208. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14192208. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39410612 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development of a Risk Assessment Tool for Venous Thromboembolism among Hospitalized Patients in the ICU.Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2024 Jan-Dec;30:10760296241280624. doi: 10.1177/10760296241280624. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2024. PMID: 39215514 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Rounding Checklists on the Outcomes of Patients Admitted to ICUs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Crit Care Explor. 2024 Aug 20;6(8):e1140. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001140. eCollection 2024 Aug 1. Crit Care Explor. 2024. PMID: 39162653 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence and Risk Factors for Deep Venous Thrombosis and Its Impact on Outcome in Patients Admitted to Medical Critical Care.Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Jun;28(6):607-613. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24723. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024. PMID: 39130389 Free PMC article.
-
Development and Validation of an ICU-Venous Thromboembolism Prediction Model Using Machine Learning Approaches: A Multicenter Study.Int J Gen Med. 2024 Jul 24;17:3279-3292. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S467374. eCollection 2024. Int J Gen Med. 2024. PMID: 39070227 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical