Demographic and clinical predictors of treatment failure one year after midurethral sling surgery
- PMID: 21422865
- PMCID: PMC3075973
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820f3892
Demographic and clinical predictors of treatment failure one year after midurethral sling surgery
Abstract
Objective: To identify clinical and demographic factors predictive of midurethral sling failure.
Methods: Overall treatment failure was defined by one or more of the following objective outcomes: a positive stress test, positive 24-hour pad test or retreatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI); subjective outcomes: self reported SUI by the Medical, Epidemiologic and Social Aspect of Aging questionnaire, incontinent episodes by 3-day diary, or retreatment for SUI, or a combination of these. Logistic regression models adjusting for sling type and clinical site were used to predict odds of overall treatment failure after univariable analysis. Models were also fit to compare factors associated with objective failure and subjective failure only.
Results: Previous UI surgery (odds ratio [OR] 1.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-3.47); maximum Q-tip excursion<30° (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.16-3.05); Medical, Epidemiologic and Social Aspect of Aging questionnaire urge score per 10 points (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.21-3.21); and pad weight per 10 g (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.10) were predictors of overall failure. Having concomitant surgery (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.90) was predictive of subjective failure only rather than objective failure. Age per 10 years (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.14-1.90); Urogenital Distress Inventory score per 10 points (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.17); pad weight per 10 g (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.10) were predictive of objective failure compared with subjective failure only. Associations of risk factors and failure were similar independent of sling type (retropubic or transobturator).
Conclusion: Twelve months after surgery, risk factors for overall and objective treatment failure were similar in women undergoing retropubic and transobturator sling procedures. This information may assist in counseling patients regarding efficacy of sling procedures and in setting expectations for women at increased odds for treatment failure.
Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00325039.
Level of evidence: II.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Characteristics Associated With Treatment Failure 1 Year After Midurethral Sling in Women With Mixed Urinary Incontinence.Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug 1;138(2):199-207. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004444. Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 34237755 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Characteristics Associated With Treatment Failure 1 Year After Midurethral Sling in Women With Mixed Urinary Incontinence.Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;136(3):482-491. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003989. Obstet Gynecol. 2020. Retraction in: Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug 1;138(2):312. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004470. PMID: 32769647 Free PMC article. Retracted. Clinical Trial.
-
Reoperation for Urinary Incontinence After Retropubic and Transobturator Sling Procedures.Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;134(2):333-342. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003356. Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31306327
-
Management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after burch and sling procedures.Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Mar;35(3):344-8. doi: 10.1002/nau.22714. Epub 2015 Jan 16. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016. PMID: 25598512 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 1;(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 31;7:CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub4. PMID: 26130017 Updated. Review.
Cited by
-
2024 Canadian Urological Association guideline: Female stress urinary incontinence.Can Urol Assoc J. 2024 Apr;18(4):83-102. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8751. Can Urol Assoc J. 2024. PMID: 38648655 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The effect of 12-month postoperative weight change on outcomes following midurethral sling for stress urinary incontinence: a secondary analysis of the ESTEEM and TOMUS randomized trials.Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Nov;34(11):2809-2816. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05654-7. Epub 2023 Sep 26. Int Urogynecol J. 2023. PMID: 37750917
-
Mixed urinary incontinence: Are there effective treatments?Neurourol Urodyn. 2023 Feb;42(2):401-408. doi: 10.1002/nau.25065. Epub 2022 Oct 23. Neurourol Urodyn. 2023. PMID: 36762411 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of hysterectomy on re-operation for stress urinary incontinence: 10 year follow-up.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Dec;306(6):2069-2075. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06737-4. Epub 2022 Aug 31. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022. PMID: 36044047 Free PMC article.
-
Second-Line Surgical Management After Midurethral Sling Failure.Int Neurourol J. 2021 Jun;25(2):111-118. doi: 10.5213/inj.2040278.139. Epub 2021 Mar 29. Int Neurourol J. 2021. PMID: 33781060 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Barber MD, Kleeman S, Karram MM, et al. Risk factors associated with failure 1 year after retropubic or transobturator midurethral slings. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:666.e1–666.e7.7. - PubMed
-
- Cammu H, Van Den Abbele E, Nagel H, et al. Factors predictive of outcome in tension-free vaginal tape procedure for urinary stress incontinence in a teaching hospital. Int Urogynecol J. 2009;20:775–780. - PubMed
-
- Stav K, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, et al. Risk factors of treatment failure of midurethral sling procedures for women with urinary stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:149–155. - PubMed
-
- Karateke A, Haliloglu B, Cam C, et al. Comparison of TVT and TVT-O in patients with stress urinary incontinence: Short-term cure rates and factors influencing the outcome. A prospective randomised study. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;49:99–105. - PubMed
-
- Paick JS, Cho MC, Oh SJ, et al. Factors influencing the outcome of mid urethral sling procedures for female urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2007;178:985–989. discussion 989. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
- U01 DK058234/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK58234/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK060393/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK60379/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK060380/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK060397/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- K24 DK068389/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK60380/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK060401/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK058229/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01DK58225/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK060395/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK58229/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK60397/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK58231/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK60393/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK060380-08/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK060379/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK60401/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK60395/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- 2K24-DK068389/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK058225/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK058231/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
