Complaints, shame and defensive medicine

BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 May;20(5):449-52. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2011.051722. Epub 2011 Mar 15.


While the complaints process is intended to improve healthcare, some doctors appear to practise defensive medicine after receiving a complaint. This response occurs in countries that use a tort-based medicolegal system as well as in countries with less professional liability. Defensive medicine is based on avoiding malpractice liability rather than considering a risk-benefit analysis for both investigations and treatment. There is also evidence that this style of practice is low quality in terms of decision-making, cost and patient outcomes. Western medical practice is based on biomedicine: determining medical failure using the underlying, taken-for-granted assumptions of biomedicine can potentially contribute to a response of shame after an adverse outcome or a complaint. Shame is implicated in the observable changes in practising behaviour after receipt of a complaint. Identifying and responding to shame is required if doctors are to respond to a complaint with an overall improvement in clinical practice. This will eventually improve the outcomes of the complaints process.

MeSH terms

  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Defensive Medicine*
  • Dissent and Disputes*
  • Humans
  • Physician-Patient Relations*
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians' / standards*
  • Quality of Health Care
  • Shame