How reliable is your hospital? A qualitative framework for analysing reliability levels
- PMID: 21441603
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.045187
How reliable is your hospital? A qualitative framework for analysing reliability levels
Abstract
Objective Many approaches and methods have been developed to reduce errors in the healthcare delivery process and to increase patient safety. One of the approaches suited to improve patient safety is reliability theory. This paper adds a qualitative dimension to the application of reliability theory in hospitals. Based on a review of the literature, the authors identified a framework of qualitative elements that can be used to diagnose, understand and thereby improve upon the level of reliability in (department of) a hospital. Results Based on the literature search, the authors identified four interconnected elements that are crucial for hospital reliability. These four elements are: process optimisation and standardisation; outcome measurement and monitoring; responsibilities and accountability of medical professionals; and organisational culture. Discussion Substantial effort has been made in the last decade to improve patient safety. The actual improvement in safety has been fairly modest, which is understandable because most hospitals currently have fairly unreliable processes in place. Using the framework presented here, hospitals can gauge the reliability of their processes and practices. Recognisable characteristics provide insights into where improvement is needed and possible. In addition, this framework provides a way to view the relationship between different patient safety building blocks and a means to link them conceptually. An integrated approach is needed for hospitals to achieve a higher reliability level with particular attention to the interconnected elements that affect patient safety.
Similar articles
-
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008. PMID: 21631815
-
Improving patient safety culture.Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2010;23(5):489-506. doi: 10.1108/09526861011050529. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2010. PMID: 20845679
-
Reliable implementation of evidence: a qualitative study of antenatal corticosteroid administration in Ohio hospitals.BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Mar;25(3):173-81. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003984. Epub 2015 Jun 8. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016. PMID: 26056321
-
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003. PMID: 14698953 Review.
-
Detecting and preventing the occurrence of errors in the practices of laboratory medicine and anatomic pathology: 15 years' experience with the College of American Pathologists' Q-PROBES and Q-TRACKS programs.Clin Lab Med. 2004 Dec;24(4):965-78. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2004.09.001. Clin Lab Med. 2004. PMID: 15555751 Review.
Cited by
-
How to build up the actionable knowledge base: the role of 'best fit' framework synthesis for studies of improvement in healthcare.BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Nov;24(11):700-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003642. Epub 2015 Aug 25. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015. PMID: 26306609 Free PMC article.
-
Improving the quality of emergency medicine care by developing a quality requirement framework: a study from The Netherlands.Int J Emerg Med. 2012 May 23;5(1):20. doi: 10.1186/1865-1380-5-20. Int J Emerg Med. 2012. PMID: 22621681 Free PMC article.
-
Mortality and morbidity meetings: an untapped resource for improving the governance of patient safety?BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jul;21(7):576-85. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000603. Epub 2012 May 3. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012. PMID: 22556308 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources